Sign in Register

Wuhan Three Towns 2-2 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 16

Kick-off

Sun 29 Jun 2025

12:35

Venue

Wuhan Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours Chengdu Better City (52%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Wuhan Three Towns face Chengdu Better City.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Wuhan Three Towns host Chengdu Better City at Wuhan Sports Centre in Super League, Regular Season - 16. Kick-off is scheduled for Sunday 29 June 2025 at 12:35 UTC.

Form Guide

Wuhan Three Towns — All Games: 2W 2D 6L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 0.80 points per game. Last five: D W L L L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes.

At home at Wuhan Sports Centre, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 2W 1D 7L this season (10 games, 0.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 5W 2D 3L from 10 outings — 1.70 PPG. Last five: L W W D L. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.20. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

When travelling in Super League this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 4W 3D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.50 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Chengdu Better City are 0.90 PPG ahead (1.70 vs 0.80), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 7 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Wuhan Three Towns, 3 for Chengdu Better City and 3 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 22 Feb 2025, ended 0–1 with Chengdu Better City winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Data

Wuhan Three Towns trading profile (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 40% of games (home games).

Chengdu Better City trading profile (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 62% versus Chengdu Better City 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 48% | Chengdu Better City 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.40 xG and Chengdu Better City 2.01 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.042 / defence 1.169 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.295 / defence 0.801. League average goals — home 1.672 / away 1.328. Chengdu Better City have an above-average attack strength of 1.295 — the away xG of 2.01 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 45 Wuhan Three Towns games / 45 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 27% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 52%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 3.70 | Draw 4.55 | Chengdu Better City 1.92. Chengdu Better City hold a narrow Poisson edge at 52% — the draw (22%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 66% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.41. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 66% — a total xG of 3.41 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.40 / 2.01) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 52% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 22% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Chengdu Better City offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 3.41 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 66% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 65%. Form rates are neutral: Wuhan Three Towns 50% | Chengdu Better City 50%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–3D–3W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 43% vs Poisson 52%.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 1.70 vs 0.80 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.40) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.90) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (2.01) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.50) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 3.41 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 52% win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 66% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 16 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Centre • Kick-off: Sunday 29 Jun 2025, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 27% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 52% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 66% | BTTS 65% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 1.40 / Chengdu Better City 2.01 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.042 / def 1.169 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.295 / def 0.801 | league avg home 1.672 / away 1.328 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (52%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.40

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Expected Goals

2.01

Chengdu Better City xG

27%
22%
52%
Wuhan Three Towns Draw Chengdu Better City

65%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

66%

Over 2.5

44%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 12:35 on Sunday 29 June 2025 at Wuhan Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Wuhan Three Towns 2 - 2 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Centre.

What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 16 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 27% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 52% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 66%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Record (7 meetings): Wuhan Three Towns 1W | Draws 3 | Chengdu Better City 3W.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in?

Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-L-L. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 5W-2D-3L in 10 | 1.70 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 1.20 | L5 L-W-W-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from Wuhan Three Towns's attack rating (1.04) and Chengdu Better City's defence rating (0.80), the model arrives at 1.40 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Chengdu Better City's attack versus Wuhan Three Towns's defence, projects 2.01 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 45/45 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 10.5%. Close behind: 1-2 (9.4%), 0-2 (6.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 27% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

27%

Wuhan Three Towns

3.76

22%

Draw

4.63

52%

Chengdu Better City

1.93

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 2

9.4%

Away win

Most likely

1 – 1

9.3%

Draw

0 – 1

6.7%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.40

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Total xG

3.41

2.01

Chengdu Better City xG

27%
22%
52%
Wuhan Three TownsDrawChengdu Better City

3.76

27%

Home win

4.63

22%

Draw

1.93

52%

Away win

Goals Markets

85%

Over 1.5

1.18

15%

Under 1.5

6.67

66%

Over 2.5

1.52

34%

Under 2.5

2.94

44%

Over 3.5

2.27

56%

Under 3.5

1.79

26%

Over 4.5

3.85

74%

Under 4.5

1.35

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.53

35%

BTTS No

2.87

Clean Sheet

13%

Wuhan Three Towns

7.46

25%

Chengdu Better City

4.04

Win to Nil

4%

Wuhan Three Towns

28.03

13%

Chengdu Better City

7.80

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.3 6.7 6.7 4.5 2.3 0.9
1 4.6 9.3 9.4 6.3 3.1 1.3
2 3.2 6.5 6.5 4.4 2.2 0.9
3 1.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.4
4 0.5 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.1
5 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.396
λ Away (xG) 2.010
Total xG 3.406
League avg home goals 1.672
League avg away goals 1.328
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 1.042
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 1.169
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.295
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.801
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 45 / 45

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.5%.

How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 1.40 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 2.01 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 3.41.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 52%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 60 outings, Wuhan Three Towns have picked up 1.37 PPG on a 22W 16D 22L record — D-W-L-L-L across the most recent five.

Chengdu Better City's form line: 33W 13D 14L from 60 games, 1.87 PPG, last five L-W-W-D-L.

Put side by side, Chengdu Better City are the form team by 0.50 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Wuhan Three Towns.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Wuhan Three Towns have posted 1.33 PPG from 30 outings (11W 7D 12L).

On the road, Chengdu Better City have gone 13W 8D 9L from 30 away games — 1.57 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 1.37 goals scored and 1.32 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.93 scored and 1.05 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Wuhan Three Towns have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
D W L L L
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
L W W D L
60 Played 60
22/16/22 W / D / L 33/13/14
1.37 Points Per Game 1.87
1.37 Avg Goals Scored 1.93
1.32 Avg Goals Conceded 1.05
2.68 Avg Goals / Game 2.98
13 Clean Sheets 20
37 BTTS 32
29 Over 2.5 Games 36
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 0–2
02 Nov
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Oct
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Aug
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
4–1 HT 3–0
03 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Jul
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
25 Jun
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
L
H Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–0
25 May
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–3 HT 1–2
21 May
W
A Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 2–1
17 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
11 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
05 May
D
A Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–4 HT 0–2
09 Apr
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 0–1
04 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–1 HT 1–0
09 Mar
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
01 Mar
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–3 HT 4–1
04 Nov
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Oct
W
A Dalian Aerbin
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Oct
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
29 Sep
L
H Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–0 HT 2–0
15 Sep
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
4–2 HT 3–1
27 Aug
W
A Chengdu Better City
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
13 Aug
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 1–2
04 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Jul
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
23 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 0–0
12 Jul
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–0
08 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–1 HT 1–1
03 Jul
D
H Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 1–0
27 May
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
5–0 HT 2–0
23 May
D
H Chengdu Better City
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
13 May
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–1
09 May
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
3–0 HT 2–0
29 Apr
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
25 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
15 Apr
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 3–1
18 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–1
21 Sep
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 2–0
14 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 3–0
09 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–0 HT 3–0
03 Aug
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–1 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Jun
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
7–0 HT 3–0
26 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 3–2
10 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
05 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 2–0
04 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
3–2 HT 1–1
29 Oct
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–0 HT 2–0
23 Oct
D
A Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
19 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–3 HT 0–3
04 Aug
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 1–1
29 Jul
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–1 HT 2–1
22 Jul
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Jul
W
H Henan Jianye
2–0 HT 0–0
11 Jul
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–3 HT 0–1
07 Jul
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
27 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–1
23 May
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
14 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Apr
D
A Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Wuhan Three Towns have gone 22W 16D 22L in their last 60 games (1.37 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 33W 13D 14L in their last 60 (1.87 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Chengdu Better City's away record (1.57 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 1.33 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.57 PPG.

Have Wuhan Three Towns or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 22% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 33%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City runs to 10 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

Wuhan Three Towns's record when hosting Chengdu Better City specifically: 0W 3D 2L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Wuhan Three Towns

5

Draws

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
1–1
01 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
17 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Wuhan Three Towns
2–2
29 Jun 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
22 Feb 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–1
20 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
01 May 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 Aug 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–3
19 May 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
23 Dec 22
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
29 Oct 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

From 10 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 1, Chengdu Better City have won 4, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Wuhan Three Towns see a goal before the break in 57% of their matches.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 50%, Chengdu Better City 57% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 40% (Wuhan Three Towns) and 50% (Chengdu Better City).

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns have failed to score in 33% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/60
(70%)
17/30
(56.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 26/60
(43.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 14/18
(77.8%)
10/13
(76.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/18
(38.9%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Winning at HT 15/60
(25%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/60
(1.7%)
0/30
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 37/60
(61.7%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/60
(48.3%)
12/30
(40%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/60
(28.3%)
6/30
(20%)
Clean Sheet 13/60
(21.7%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Failed to Score 14/60
(23.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 50/60
(83.3%)
24/30
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/60
(48.3%)
11/30
(36.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/10
(80%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/10
(40%)
2/6
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 26/60
(43.3%)
9/30
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/60
(3.3%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/60
(53.3%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/60
(60%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
9/30
(30%)
Clean Sheet 20/60
(33.3%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Failed to Score 10/60
(16.7%)
6/30
(20%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Chengdu Better City?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 50% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent matches and 57% of Chengdu Better City's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 40% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent games and 50% of Chengdu Better City's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 57% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 80% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City finished level at 2-2 at Wuhan Sports Centre, Regular Season - 16, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 1.40 xG and Chengdu Better City 2.01 xG, a combined 3.41. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.04 / defence 1.17 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.29 / defence 0.80, drawn from 45/45 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 27% | Draw 22% | Chengdu Better City 52%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 52%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 66%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 44% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 54% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 48%, Chengdu Better City 60%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 1.87 PPG against 1.37. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.20 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 66% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 65% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 54% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.