Sign in Register

Shenzhen Ruby FC 3-2 Meizhou Kejia – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 10

Kick-off

Sun 28 May 2023

12:35

Venue

Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Meizhou Kejia at 45% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Meizhou Kejia make the trip to Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre to face Shenzhen Ruby FC in Super League, Regular Season - 10. The match kicks off on Sunday 28 May 2023 at 12:35 UTC.

Form

Shenzhen Ruby FC (all games): 1W 0D 9L across 10 Super League fixtures this term — 0.30 PPG. Last five: L L L L L. They are averaging 0.30 goals per game and conceding 2.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.90 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in only 20% of their games — a low BTTS rate that suggests clean sheets are a regular occurrence.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's home record at Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre: 2W 1D 7L from 10 Super League appearances (0.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.50 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Meizhou Kejia's overall Super League record this term: 4W 0D 6L from 10 games (1.20 PPG). Last five: L L W L W. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 1.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in only 10% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No.

When travelling in Super League this season, Meizhou Kejia have posted 3W 1D 6L from 10 away outings — 1.00 PPG. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. Meizhou Kejia are 0.90 PPG clear of Shenzhen Ruby FC in recent Super League fixtures (1.20 vs 0.30). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

Both sides have a clean-sheet tendency (using home/away splits) — Shenzhen Ruby FC have seen both teams score in just 30% of their matches, Meizhou Kejia in only 20%. BTTS No has clear statistical support from the form record of both squads.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Shenzhen Ruby FC lead 0W to 2W over the last 2 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 3 Jul 2022, ended 0–1 with Meizhou Kejia winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading & In-Play

Shenzhen Ruby FC — key trading statistics (34 games, 17 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 35% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 59% of games (home games); they fail to score in 47% of games.

Meizhou Kejia — key trading statistics (34 games, 17 at away): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 24% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 41% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Shenzhen Ruby FC 41% versus Meizhou Kejia 41%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Shenzhen Ruby FC 56% | Meizhou Kejia 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.14 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.56 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 0.786 / defence 1.188 | Meizhou Kejia attack 1.016 / defence 1.072. League average goals — home 1.356 / away 1.294. Shenzhen Ruby FC's attack strength of 0.786 is below the league average — the 1.14 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 42 Shenzhen Ruby FC games / 43 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Shenzhen Ruby FC 26% | Draw 30% | Meizhou Kejia 45%. Fair-value odds: Shenzhen Ruby FC 3.85 | Draw 3.33 | Meizhou Kejia 2.22. Meizhou Kejia hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (30%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.71. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.71 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

Form shows strong BTTS No rates for both sides but Poisson BTTS probability is 56% — current-season attack strengths are higher than recent results suggest.

On the Poisson output, Meizhou Kejia are the pick at 45% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 30% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Meizhou Kejia if the outright odds are short.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.71 combined xG gives a 51% probability to Over 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 56%. This conflicts with form data: Shenzhen Ruby FC 30% | Meizhou Kejia 20% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Meizhou Kejia — H2H win rate 100% vs Poisson 45%.
Form Meizhou Kejia lead on PPG: 1.20 vs 0.30 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Shenzhen Ruby FC Poisson xG (1.14) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.50) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Meizhou Kejia Poisson xG (1.56) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.90) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.7 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.71 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Meizhou Kejia — Meizhou Kejia at 45% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 30% — tight contest expected.
Contradiction Form shows strong BTTS No rates for both sides but Poisson BTTS probability is 56% — current-season attack strengths are higher than recent results suggest.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 10 | Venue: Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre • Kick-off: Sunday 28 May 2023, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Shenzhen Ruby FC 26% | Draw 30% | Meizhou Kejia 45% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 51% | BTTS 56% | xG Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.14 / Meizhou Kejia 1.56 • Poisson strength factors: Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 0.786 / def 1.188 | Meizhou Kejia attack 1.016 / def 1.072 | league avg home 1.356 / away 1.294 • Poisson stance: Meizhou Kejia (45%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.14

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

Expected Goals

1.56

Meizhou Kejia xG

26%
30%
45%
Shenzhen Ruby FC Draw Meizhou Kejia

56%

BTTS

77%

Over 1.5

51%

Over 2.5

29%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia kick off?

Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia kicked off at 12:35 on Sunday 28 May 2023 at Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia?

Shenzhen Ruby FC 3 - 2 Meizhou Kejia.

Where is Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia being played?

The match is being played at Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre.

What competition is Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia part of?

Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia is a Regular Season - 10 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our statistical model gives Shenzhen Ruby FC a 26% chance of winning, Meizhou Kejia a 45% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making Meizhou Kejia the favourite.

Will both teams score in Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our model estimates a 56% probability that both Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia will score (BTTS).

Will Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 51%.

What is the head-to-head record between Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia?

Record (2 meetings): Shenzhen Ruby FC 0W | Draws 0 | Meizhou Kejia 2W.

What form are Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia in?

Shenzhen Ruby FC (all comps): 1W-0D-9L in 10 | 0.30 PPG | GF 0.30 / GA 2.90 | L5 L-L-L-L-L. Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 4W-0D-6L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.20 | L5 L-L-W-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Working from Shenzhen Ruby FC's attack rating (0.79) and Meizhou Kejia's defence rating (1.07), the model arrives at 1.14 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Meizhou Kejia's attack (1.02x) against Shenzhen Ruby FC's defence (1.19x) — and the away total comes out at 1.56.

These ratings are built from 42/43 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 13.5%. Close behind: 1-2 (9.3%), 0-1 (8.9%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 32% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Meizhou Kejia Win

26%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

3.92

30%

Draw

3.37

45%

Meizhou Kejia

2.23

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.9%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

10.5%

Away win

1 – 2

9.3%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.14

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

Total xG

2.71

1.56

Meizhou Kejia xG

26%
30%
45%
Shenzhen Ruby FCDrawMeizhou Kejia

3.92

26%

Home win

3.37

30%

Draw

2.23

45%

Away win

Goals Markets

75%

Over 1.5

1.33

25%

Under 1.5

4.00

51%

Over 2.5

1.96

49%

Under 2.5

2.04

29%

Over 3.5

3.45

71%

Under 3.5

1.41

14%

Over 4.5

7.14

86%

Under 4.5

1.16

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

56%

BTTS Yes

1.78

44%

BTTS No

2.28

Clean Sheet

21%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

4.77

32%

Meizhou Kejia

3.13

Win to Nil

5%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

18.69

14%

Meizhou Kejia

6.99

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 6.7 10.5 8.2 4.3 1.7 0.5
1 7.6 11.9 9.3 4.9 1.9 0.6
2 4.4 6.8 5.3 2.8 1.1 0.3
3 1.7 2.6 2.0 1.1 0.4 0.1
4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1
5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.142
λ Away (xG) 1.563
Total xG 2.705
League avg home goals 1.356
League avg away goals 1.294
Shenzhen Ruby FC attack strength 0.786
Shenzhen Ruby FC defence strength 1.188
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 1.016
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.072
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 42 / 43

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.5%.

How many goals are Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia expected to score?

The model projects 1.14 expected goals for Shenzhen Ruby FC and 1.56 for Meizhou Kejia, a combined total of 2.71.

How confident is the prediction model for Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 45%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 34 outings, Shenzhen Ruby FC have picked up 0.88 PPG on a 9W 3D 22L record — L-L-L-L-L across the most recent five.

Meizhou Kejia's form line: 14W 7D 13L from 34 games, 1.44 PPG, last five L-L-W-L-W.

Put side by side, Meizhou Kejia are the form team by 0.56 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Shenzhen Ruby FC.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Shenzhen Ruby FC have posted 0.94 PPG from 17 outings (5W 1D 11L).

On the road, Meizhou Kejia have gone 5W 4D 8L from 17 away games — 1.12 PPG when travelling.

Attack vs Defence

Shenzhen Ruby FC are averaging 0.85 goals scored and 2.12 conceded per game recently; Meizhou Kejia are on 1.26 scored and 1.21 conceded.

Last 34 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Current Season
L L L L L
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Current Season
L L W L W
34 Played 34
9/3/22 W / D / L 14/7/13
0.88 Points Per Game 1.44
0.85 Avg Goals Scored 1.26
2.12 Avg Goals Conceded 1.21
2.97 Avg Goals / Game 2.47
5 Clean Sheets 11
14 BTTS 14
19 Over 2.5 Games 17
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
30 Dec
L
H Guangzhou R&F
0–3 HT 0–2
27 Dec
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–8 HT 0–3
19 Dec
L
A Hebei Zhongji
0–2 HT 0–0
15 Dec
L
H Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Dec
L
H Wuhan Zall
1–2 HT 1–1
30 Nov
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–4 HT 0–1
26 Nov
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 2–0
22 Nov
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–3
13 Nov
L
H Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Oct
W
H Hebei Zhongji
2–1 HT 2–1
24 Oct
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Oct
D
A Guangzhou R&F
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Oct
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Sep
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–4 HT 0–1
24 Sep
W
A Wuhan Zall
3–0 HT 1–0
20 Sep
L
A Dalian Aerbin
1–5 HT 1–2
01 Sep
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–5 HT 0–2
28 Aug
L
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–4 HT 1–2
21 Aug
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 1–1
07 Jul
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Jul
L
H Tianjin Teda
2–3 HT 2–1
29 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–4 HT 0–1
21 Jun
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Jun
L
H Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 0–1
13 Jun
W
A Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 0–0
09 Jun
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–0 HT 1–0
04 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Jan
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 0–0
31 Dec
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3
27 Dec
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Dec
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Dec
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
10 Dec
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 3–0
05 Dec
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
01 Dec
L
A Dalian Aerbin
1–2 HT 0–1
26 Nov
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–3 HT 0–2
21 Nov
W
A Guangzhou R&F
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–0
08 Nov
D
A Wuhan Zall
0–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–7 HT 0–3
24 Oct
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
3–1 HT 2–0
09 Oct
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Sep
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 1–0
10 Sep
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–2 HT 1–1
28 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–2
22 Aug
W
H Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
W
H Wuhan Zall
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–2
17 Jun
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia in coming into this match?

Shenzhen Ruby FC have gone 9W 3D 22L in their last 34 games (0.88 PPG), while Meizhou Kejia have gone 14W 7D 13L in their last 34 (1.44 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Shenzhen Ruby FC at home or Meizhou Kejia away?

Meizhou Kejia's away record (1.12 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Shenzhen Ruby FC at home: 0.94 PPG; Meizhou Kejia away: 1.12 PPG.

Have Shenzhen Ruby FC or Meizhou Kejia been keeping clean sheets recently?

Shenzhen Ruby FC have kept a clean sheet in 15% of their recent games, Meizhou Kejia in 32%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 4 times that we have on record, stretching back to June 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 16 September 2023, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Meizhou Kejia won 5-1 on 16 Sep 2023, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Shenzhen Ruby FC have gone 1W 0D 1L from 2 meetings on their own ground against Meizhou Kejia — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

Shenzhen Ruby FC

1

Shenzhen Ruby FC

0

Draws

Meizhou Kejia

3

Meizhou Kejia

Recent Meetings

Meizhou Kejia
5–1
16 Sep 23
Shenzhen Ruby FC
Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–2
28 May 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–0
03 Jul 22
Shenzhen Ruby FC
Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–2
13 Jun 22
Meizhou Kejia

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia?

From 4 meetings on record, Shenzhen Ruby FC have won 1, Meizhou Kejia have won 3, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia last play each other?

They last met on 16 September 2023, when Meizhou Kejia 5-1 Shenzhen Ruby FC.

Who has won more matches between Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia?

Meizhou Kejia have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Shenzhen Ruby FC are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 82% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 29% of the time.

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 69% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.

Full-Time Markets

Neither side has been leaking BTTS chances often — 35% (Shenzhen Ruby FC) and 24% (Meizhou Kejia) both sit on the low side, favouring BTTS No.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 59% (Shenzhen Ruby FC) and 41% (Meizhou Kejia).

On the defensive side: Meizhou Kejia in 35%; Shenzhen Ruby FC have failed to score in 53% of games; Meizhou Kejia in 59%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Shenzhen Ruby FC home games / Meizhou Kejia away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Shenzhen Ruby FC Shenzhen Ruby FC Current Season
Metric All
(34 games)
Venue
(17 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 27/34
(79.4%)
14/17
(82.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 14/34
(41.2%)
7/17
(41.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/7
(85.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/7
(71.4%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 7/34
(20.6%)
5/17
(29.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/34
(2.9%)
1/17
(5.9%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/34
(5.9%)
1/17
(5.9%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 14/34
(41.2%)
6/17
(35.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 19/34
(55.9%)
10/17
(58.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 9/34
(26.5%)
3/17
(17.6%)
Clean Sheet 5/34
(14.7%)
3/17
(17.6%)
Failed to Score 16/34
(47.1%)
9/17
(52.9%)
Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Current Season
Metric All
(34 games)
Venue
(17 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 22/33
(66.7%)
11/16
(68.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 10/33
(30.3%)
5/16
(31.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/11
(63.6%)
2/5
(40%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/11
(18.2%)
0/5
(0%)
Winning at HT 9/33
(27.3%)
4/16
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/33
(3%)
0/16
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/33
(6.1%)
0/16
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 14/34
(41.2%)
4/17
(23.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/34
(50%)
7/17
(41.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/34
(23.5%)
3/17
(17.6%)
Clean Sheet 11/34
(32.4%)
6/17
(35.3%)
Failed to Score 13/34
(38.2%)
10/17
(58.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Shenzhen Ruby FC play Meizhou Kejia?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 35% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's recent matches and 24% of Meizhou Kejia's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Meizhou Kejia usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 59% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's recent games and 41% of Meizhou Kejia's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Shenzhen Ruby FC and Meizhou Kejia tend to score early?

Shenzhen Ruby FC have had a goal before half-time in 82% of their recent matches, Meizhou Kejia in 69% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Shenzhen Ruby FC defy the odds to beat Meizhou Kejia 3-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Shenzhen Ruby FC beat Meizhou Kejia 3-2 at Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre, Regular Season - 10, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.14 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.56 xG, a combined 2.71. The scoreboard read 3-2 for 5 actual goals. Shenzhen Ruby FC beat their projection by 1.9 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 0.79 / defence 1.19 against Meizhou Kejia attack 1.02 / defence 1.07, drawn from 42/43 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Shenzhen Ruby FC 26% | Draw 30% | Meizhou Kejia 45%, with Meizhou Kejia to win its most likely call at 45%. The actual Shenzhen Ruby FC win had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 77% and landed. Over 3.5 was 29% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Shenzhen Ruby FC 56%, Meizhou Kejia 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 41%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Shenzhen Ruby FC's trading profile (34 games, 17 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did.

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (34 games, 17 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Meizhou Kejia arrived the stronger side — 1.44 PPG against 0.88. Form was overturned, with Shenzhen Ruby FC winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Shenzhen Ruby FC (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 0.76 average — above their attacking norm. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 0.76 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 3 against a 1.35 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 51% Over 2.5 probability, 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 56% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 53% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.