Sign in Register

Cercle Brugge 0-1 Lommel United – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Jupiler Pro League · Regular Season - 4

Kick-off

Sat 29 Aug 2026

18:45

Venue

Jan Breydel Stadium

Competition

Jupiler Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Cercle Brugge at 50%, yet other data sources diverge — this Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Cercle Brugge and Lommel United meet at Jan Breydel Stadium in Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 4. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 29 August 2026 at 18:45 UTC.

Current Form

Cercle Brugge's overall Jupiler Pro League record this term: 4W 3D 3L from 10 games (1.50 PPG). Last five: L L D D L. They are averaging 2.20 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. Cercle Brugge have played only a handful of Jupiler Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Cercle Brugge's home record at Jan Breydel Stadium: 2W 3D 5L from 10 Jupiler Pro League appearances (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.90 lags behind their overall 1.50 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Jan Breydel Stadium this season.

Lommel United have collected 2.00 PPG across 10 Jupiler Pro League outings this season: 6W 2D 2L. Last five: W D D L W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.00 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Lommel United have played only a handful of Jupiler Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

When travelling in Jupiler Pro League this season, Lommel United have posted 4W 3D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.50 PPG. Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.50 is notably below their overall 2.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Lommel United arrive in superior form — a 0.50 PPG advantage (2.00 vs 1.50) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Cercle Brugge have seen both teams score in 70% of their games, Lommel United in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Trading Data

Cercle Brugge goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (39 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 90% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 40% of the time; BTTS occurs in 79% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 74% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%.

Lommel United goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (39 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; BTTS occurs in 63% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Cercle Brugge 67% and Lommel United 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Cercle Brugge 59% | Lommel United 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cercle Brugge 1.89 xG and Lommel United 1.37 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cercle Brugge attack 1.106 / defence 1.235 | Lommel United attack 0.833 / defence 1.055. League average goals — home 1.616 / away 1.332. Data: 33 Cercle Brugge games / 3 Lommel United games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Cercle Brugge 50% | Draw 22% | Lommel United 28%. Fair-value odds: Cercle Brugge 2.00 | Draw 4.55 | Lommel United 3.57. Cercle Brugge hold a narrow Poisson edge at 50% — the draw (22%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 63% | Total xG 3.25. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.25 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 63% reflects that both xG figures (1.89 / 1.37) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Cercle Brugge at 50% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Lommel United (2.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 22% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Cercle Brugge if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.25 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 63% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 63% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Cercle Brugge 70% | Lommel United 60% BTTS from recent games.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (3 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form Lommel United lead on PPG: 2.00 vs 1.50 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Cercle Brugge Poisson xG (1.89) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.50) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Cercle Brugge 7/10, Lommel United 6/10) and Poisson model (63%).
Form Form (PPG) favours Lommel United but Poisson leans Cercle Brugge (50%) — divergence worth monitoring.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 63% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 63% — model favours both teams scoring.
Market Poisson model is blending current and prior-season data with limited current-season samples (33/3 games) — model confidence is moderate; treat probability edges as indicative rather than definitive.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 4 | Venue: Jan Breydel Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 29 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Cercle Brugge 50% | Draw 22% | Lommel United 28% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 63% | BTTS 63% | xG Cercle Brugge 1.89 / Lommel United 1.37 • Poisson strength factors: Cercle Brugge attack 1.106 / def 1.235 | Lommel United attack 0.833 / def 1.055 | league avg home 1.616 / away 1.332 • Poisson stance: Cercle Brugge (50%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.89

Cercle Brugge xG

Expected Goals

1.37

Lommel United xG

50%
22%
28%
Cercle Brugge Draw Lommel United

63%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

63%

Over 2.5

41%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United kick off?

Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United kicked off at 18:45 on Saturday 29 August 2026 at Jan Breydel Stadium.

What was the final score in Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United?

Cercle Brugge 0 - 1 Lommel United.

Where is Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United being played?

The match is being played at Jan Breydel Stadium.

What competition is Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United part of?

Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United is a Regular Season - 4 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United?

Our statistical model gives Cercle Brugge a 50% chance of winning, Lommel United a 28% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Cercle Brugge the favourite.

Will both teams score in Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United?

Our model estimates a 63% probability that both Cercle Brugge and Lommel United will score (BTTS).

Will Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 63%.

What is the head-to-head record between Cercle Brugge and Lommel United?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are Cercle Brugge and Lommel United in?

Cercle Brugge (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 2.20 / GA 1.90 | L5 L-L-D-D-L. Lommel United (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 0.90 | L5 W-D-D-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Working from Cercle Brugge's attack rating (1.11) and Lommel United's defence rating (1.05), the model arrives at 1.89 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Lommel United's attack (0.83x) against Cercle Brugge's defence (1.24x) — and the away total comes out at 1.37.

The sample (33/3 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.3%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.4%), 2-0 (6.9%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Cercle Brugge Win

50%

Cercle Brugge

2.02

22%

Draw

4.46

28%

Lommel United

3.58

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.0%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.4%

Home win

1 – 0

7.3%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.89

Cercle Brugge xG

Total xG

3.25

1.37

Lommel United xG

50%
22%
28%
Cercle BruggeDrawLommel United

2.02

50%

Home win

4.46

22%

Draw

3.58

28%

Away win

Goals Markets

84%

Over 1.5

1.19

16%

Under 1.5

6.25

63%

Over 2.5

1.59

37%

Under 2.5

2.70

41%

Over 3.5

2.44

59%

Under 3.5

1.69

23%

Over 4.5

4.35

77%

Under 4.5

1.30

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

63%

BTTS Yes

1.58

37%

BTTS No

2.72

Clean Sheet

25%

Cercle Brugge

3.93

15%

Lommel United

6.59

Win to Nil

13%

Cercle Brugge

7.93

4%

Lommel United

23.55

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.9 5.3 3.6 1.7 0.6 0.2
1 7.3 10.0 6.8 3.1 1.1 0.3
2 6.9 9.4 6.4 2.9 1.0 0.3
3 4.3 5.9 4.0 1.8 0.6 0.2
4 2.0 2.8 1.9 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.885
λ Away (xG) 1.369
Total xG 3.254
League avg home goals 1.616
League avg away goals 1.332
Cercle Brugge attack strength 1.106
Cercle Brugge defence strength 1.235
Lommel United attack strength 0.833
Lommel United defence strength 1.055
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 33 / 3

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.3%.

How many goals are Cercle Brugge and Lommel United expected to score?

The model projects 1.89 expected goals for Cercle Brugge and 1.37 for Lommel United, a combined total of 3.25.

How confident is the prediction model for Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 50%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Cercle Brugge's recent record stands at 10W 13D 16L from 39 games, a 1.10 PPG return, with L-L-D-D-L in the last five. It's still early in the season for Cercle Brugge, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Lommel United, meanwhile, have gone 20W 9D 10L across 39 games — 1.77 PPG, with W-D-D-L-W in their last five. It's still early in the season for Lommel United, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

The points-per-game comparison favours Lommel United by 0.67 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Cercle Brugge heading into this one.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, Cercle Brugge have managed 3W 6D 10L from 19 games — 0.79 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Lommel United's away record stands at 9W 6D 4L across 19 trips, a 1.74 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Lommel United come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Cercle Brugge are averaging 1.49 goals scored and 1.64 conceded per game recently; Lommel United are on 1.85 scored and 1.28 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Cercle Brugge have seen both teams score in 67% of their recent games; Lommel United in 62%.

Last 39 Results — Jupiler Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

Early Season
L L D D L
Lommel United

Lommel United

Early Season
W D D L W
39 Played 39
10/13/16 W / D / L 20/9/10
1.10 Points Per Game 1.77
1.49 Avg Goals Scored 1.85
1.64 Avg Goals Conceded 1.28
3.13 Avg Goals / Game 3.13
8 Clean Sheets 9
26 BTTS 24
23 Over 2.5 Games 23
Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

L
A Club Brugge KV
0–1 HT 0–1
23 Aug
D
H St. Truiden
3–3 HT 1–2
14 Aug
D
A Standard Liege
2–2 HT 1–1
08 Aug
L
A RAAL La Louvière
1–4 HT 1–0
09 May
L
H Zulte Waregem
2–3 HT 1–0
01 May
W
H Dender
2–1 HT 1–0
24 Apr
W
A Dender
4–1 HT 1–1
19 Apr
W
H RAAL La Louvière
3–0 HT 2–0
11 Apr
D
A Zulte Waregem
2–2 HT 1–0
04 Apr
W
A Anderlecht
3–2 HT 3–1
22 Mar
L
H RAAL La Louvière
1–3 HT 0–1
15 Mar
L
A St. Truiden
1–2 HT 0–1
08 Mar
D
H Dender
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
W
A Gent
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Feb
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–2 HT 0–0
15 Feb
W
A Charleroi
4–3 HT 3–1
07 Feb
L
H Antwerp
0–4 HT 0–2
31 Jan
D
A Genk
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Jan
W
A KVC Westerlo
2–0 HT 2–0
17 Jan
D
H Union St. Gilloise
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Dec
W
A OH Leuven
2–0 HT 2–0
21 Dec
L
H KV Mechelen
2–3 HT 0–2
13 Dec
L
H Standard Liege
1–2 HT 0–2
06 Dec
D
A Zulte Waregem
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Nov
L
A Union St. Gilloise
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Nov
L
H OH Leuven
1–2 HT 1–0
08 Nov
L
A RAAL La Louvière
1–2 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Zulte Waregem
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Oct
D
H Genk
2–2 HT 1–1
19 Oct
D
A Antwerp
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Oct
L
H Gent
2–4 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
A KV Mechelen
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
L
H Charleroi
2–3 HT 0–2
14 Sep
D
H St. Truiden
1–1 HT 1–1
29 Aug
W
A Standard Liege
3–0 HT 3–0
23 Aug
W
H KVC Westerlo
4–1 HT 3–0
17 Aug
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–2 HT 0–0
09 Aug
L
H Anderlecht
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Aug
D
A Dender
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Jul
Lommel United

Lommel United

W
H KVC Westerlo
4–0 HT 2–0
23 Aug
L
H Charleroi
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Aug
D
A St. Truiden
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Aug
D
A Dender
0–0 HT 0–0
23 May
W
H Dender
3–2 HT 0–1
17 May
W
A Beerschot VA
3–1 HT 0–0
09 May
W
H Beerschot VA
3–1 HT 2–1
02 May
W
A Liège
2–1 HT 2–1
27 Apr
W
H Liège
3–0 HT 2–0
23 Apr
L
A Beerschot VA
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Apr
L
H Club Brugge II
0–1 HT 0–0
11 Apr
W
H RWDM
3–2 HT 0–0
04 Apr
W
H Francs Borains
3–1 HT 3–1
15 Mar
D
A KAA Gent II
2–2 HT 0–1
11 Mar
D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
H Seraing United
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Mar
W
A Lokeren-Temse
3–2 HT 1–0
21 Feb
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
2–0 HT 2–0
14 Feb
L
A SK Beveren
0–2 HT 0–0
08 Feb
D
H Patro Eisden
1–1 HT 1–0
31 Jan
L
A Liège
0–1 HT 0–0
27 Jan
W
H AS Eupen
3–2 HT 0–2
24 Jan
W
A KRC Genk II
2–0 HT 2–0
16 Jan
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
4–3 HT 3–2
19 Dec
W
A Olympic Charleroi
2–1 HT 1–1
16 Dec
W
H KAA Gent II
2–0 HT 2–0
12 Dec
W
A AS Eupen
2–1 HT 1–1
28 Nov
L
A Kortrijk
2–4 HT 1–2
22 Nov
D
H SK Beveren
2–2 HT 0–1
07 Nov
D
A K. Lierse S.K.
4–4 HT 2–2
31 Oct
L
H Beerschot VA
1–2 HT 1–0
26 Oct
D
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 1–0
18 Oct
W
A Seraing United
3–2 HT 1–1
03 Oct
L
H Liège
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
W
A Club Brugge II
2–0 HT 0–0
24 Sep
L
H KRC Genk II
1–2 HT 0–1
19 Sep
W
A Patro Eisden
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Sep
W
H Lokeren-Temse
3–1 HT 1–1
30 Aug
D
A Francs Borains
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Cercle Brugge and Lommel United in coming into this match?

Cercle Brugge have gone 10W 13D 16L in their last 39 games (1.10 PPG), while Lommel United have gone 20W 9D 10L in their last 39 (1.77 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Cercle Brugge at home or Lommel United away?

Lommel United's away record (1.74 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Cercle Brugge at home: 0.79 PPG; Lommel United away: 1.74 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 1 times that we have on record, stretching back to August 2026 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Jupiler Pro League. The two were last together as recently as 29 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Last 1 Meetings

Cercle Brugge

0

Cercle Brugge

0

Draws

Lommel United

1

Lommel United

Recent Meetings

Cercle Brugge
0–1
29 Aug 26
Lommel United

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Cercle Brugge and Lommel United?

From 1 meetings on record, Cercle Brugge have won 0, Lommel United have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Cercle Brugge and Lommel United last play each other?

They last met on 29 August 2026, when Cercle Brugge 0-1 Lommel United.

Who has won more matches between Cercle Brugge and Lommel United?

Lommel United have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 1 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Cercle Brugge are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 90% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 10% of those situations.

Lommel United are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 32% of the time.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 79% for Cercle Brugge, 63% for Lommel United — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 74% for Cercle Brugge and 58% for Lommel United. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 47% and 37% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Cercle Brugge home games / Lommel United away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Early Season
Metric All
(39 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 34/39
(87.2%)
17/19
(89.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 19/39
(48.7%)
11/19
(57.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/5
(40%)
1/2
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/5
(40%)
1/2
(50%)
Winning at HT 13/39
(33.3%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/39
(10.3%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/39
(10.3%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 26/39
(66.7%)
15/19
(78.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 23/39
(59%)
14/19
(73.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 15/39
(38.5%)
9/19
(47.4%)
Clean Sheet 8/39
(20.5%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Failed to Score 8/39
(20.5%)
3/19
(15.8%)
Lommel United Lommel United Early Season
Metric All
(39 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 28/39
(71.8%)
13/19
(68.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/39
(43.6%)
8/19
(42.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/11
(81.8%)
4/6
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
3/6
(50%)
Winning at HT 15/39
(38.5%)
6/19
(31.6%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/39
(10.3%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/39
(10.3%)
1/19
(5.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/39
(61.5%)
12/19
(63.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 23/39
(59%)
11/19
(57.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 16/39
(41%)
7/19
(36.8%)
Clean Sheet 9/39
(23.1%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Failed to Score 8/39
(20.5%)
4/19
(21.1%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Cercle Brugge play Lommel United?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 79% of Cercle Brugge's games and 63% of Lommel United's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Cercle Brugge vs Lommel United usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 74% of Cercle Brugge's matches and 58% of Lommel United's.

Do Cercle Brugge and Lommel United tend to score early?

Cercle Brugge have had a goal before half-time in 90% of their recent matches, Lommel United in 68% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Lommel United defy the odds to beat Cercle Brugge 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Lommel United beat Cercle Brugge 0-1 at Jan Breydel Stadium, Regular Season - 4, in the Jupiler Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cercle Brugge 1.89 xG and Lommel United 1.37 xG, a combined 3.25. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Cercle Brugge fell 1.9 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cercle Brugge attack 1.11 / defence 1.24 against Lommel United attack 0.83 / defence 1.05, drawn from 33/3 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Cercle Brugge 50% | Draw 22% | Lommel United 28%, with Cercle Brugge to win its most likely call at 50%. The actual Lommel United win had been the model's second-ranked read at 28%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 84% and missed. Over 3.5 was 41% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cercle Brugge 59%, Lommel United 59%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 64%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cercle Brugge's trading profile (39 games, 19 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not.

Lommel United's trading profile (39 games, 19 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, Lommel United arrived the stronger side — 1.77 PPG against 1.10. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Cercle Brugge (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.53 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.00 average — tighter than their form line. Lommel United (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.37 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 63% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 63% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 59% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.