KFUM Oslo 1-1 Bodo/Glimt – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 65% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Analysis
Bodo/Glimt make the trip to KFUM Arena to face KFUM Oslo in Eliteserien (matchday 16). The match kicks off on Saturday 27 July 2024 at 16:00 UK time.
Form
KFUM Oslo (all games): 4W 3D 3L across their last 10 — 1.50 PPG. Last five: D L L W W. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.70 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.
At home, KFUM Oslo have gone 0W 4D 3L in their last 7 home games (0.57 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.86 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 71% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.57 lags behind their overall 1.50 — home advantage has not translated into better results recently.
Bodo/Glimt have collected 2.00 PPG across their last 10 games: 6W 2D 2L. Last five: W W W L W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.30 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
Bodo/Glimt away from home: 7W 0D 3L from their last 10 away games — 2.10 PPG on the road. They are averaging 2.40 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. 4 clean sheets from their last 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.
The travelling side arrive in better shape. Bodo/Glimt are 0.50 PPG clear of KFUM Oslo over their recent games (2.00 vs 1.50). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.
H2H History
The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 1 H2H match in our data, the wins are level at 0 apiece, with 1 draw. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 1 H2H match to go on, treat this as a light input.
The 1 H2H match in our data have been high-scoring — 4.0 goals per game on average — which backs the Over 2.5 market from the head-to-head side. The most recent of those, on 24 May 2024, ended KFUM Oslo 2–2 Bodo/Glimt — a draw.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 4.0 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.
Trading
KFUM Oslo half-time and goal-timing data (last 15 games, 7 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 57% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; of the 4 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 25%; of the 4 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 25%; BTTS occurs in 71% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 40%.
Bodo/Glimt half-time and goal-timing data (last 15 games, 7 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 86% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 71% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 47%.
From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — KFUM Oslo 73% and Bodo/Glimt 60% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (KFUM Oslo 60% | Bodo/Glimt 60%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects KFUM Oslo 0.99 xG and Bodo/Glimt 2.23 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: KFUM Oslo attack 0.796 / defence 1.298 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.239 / defence 0.885. League average goals — home 1.405 / away 1.389. KFUM Oslo's attack rating of 0.796 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 0.99. Bodo/Glimt have an above-average attack rating of 1.239, which lifts their away xG to 2.23. KFUM Oslo's defence rating of 1.298 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing Bodo/Glimt's projected output up. Data: built from KFUM Oslo's last 15 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 46.
Result probabilities: KFUM Oslo 15% | Draw 19% | Bodo/Glimt 65%. Fair-value odds: KFUM Oslo 6.52 | Draw 5.18 | Bodo/Glimt 1.53. The model has a clear lean to Bodo/Glimt (65%) — a 46pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 62% | BTTS Yes probability 56% | Total xG 3.22. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 62% — the 3.22 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 56% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Final Verdict
Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt as the most likely outcome at 65% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 19% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
The Poisson model projects 3.22 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 62% — reasonable conviction, supported by recent form (KFUM Oslo's last 7 home games and Bodo/Glimt's last 10 away games) averaging 3.2 goals per game.
Poisson assigns a 56% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: KFUM Oslo 71% (last 7 home games) | Bodo/Glimt 50% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt | Competition: Eliteserien, matchday 16 | Venue: KFUM Arena • Kick-off: Saturday 27 July 2024 at 16:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: KFUM Oslo 15% | Draw 19% | Bodo/Glimt 65% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 62% (Under 38%) | BTTS Yes 56% (No 44%) | xG KFUM Oslo 0.99 / Bodo/Glimt 2.23 • Poisson strength factors: KFUM Oslo attack 0.796 / def 1.298 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.239 / def 0.885 | league avg home 1.405 / away 1.389 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (65%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
0.99
KFUM Oslo xG
Expected Goals
2.23
Bodo/Glimt xG
56%
BTTS
83%
Over 1.5
62%
Over 2.5
40%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt FAQs
What time does KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt kick off?
KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt kicked off at 16:00 UK time on Saturday 27 July 2024 at KFUM Arena.
What was the final score in KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt?
KFUM Oslo 1 - 1 Bodo/Glimt.
Where is KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt being played?
The match is being played at KFUM Arena.
What competition is KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt part of?
KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt is a Eliteserien fixture (matchday 16) (Norway).
Who is favourite to win KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our statistical model gives KFUM Oslo a 15% chance of winning, Bodo/Glimt a 65% chance, and a 19% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.
Will both teams score in KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our model estimates a 56% probability that both KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 62%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Working from KFUM Oslo's attack rating (0.80) and Bodo/Glimt's defence rating (0.89), the model arrives at 0.99 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Bodo/Glimt's attack (1.24x) against KFUM Oslo's defence (1.30x) — and the away total comes out at 2.23.
These ratings are built from KFUM Oslo's last 15 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 46 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 10.0%. Close behind: 0-2 (9.9%), 1-2 (9.8%). Together the top three scorelines make up 30% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
Bodo/Glimt Win
15%
6.52
19%
5.18
65%
1.53
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
0 β 2
9.9%
Away win
Most likely
1 β 2
9.8%
Away win
0 β 1
8.9%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
0.99
KFUM Oslo xG
Total xG
3.22
2.23
Bodo/Glimt xG
6.52
15%
Home win
5.18
19%
Draw
1.53
65%
Away win
Goals Markets
83%
Over 1.5
1.20
17%
Under 1.5
5.88
62%
Over 2.5
1.61
38%
Under 2.5
2.63
40%
Over 3.5
2.50
60%
Under 3.5
1.67
22%
Over 4.5
4.55
78%
Under 4.5
1.28
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
56%
BTTS Yes
1.78
44%
BTTS No
2.28
Clean Sheet
11%
9.33
37%
2.69
Win to Nil
2%
60.81
24%
4.11
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.0 | 8.9 | 9.9 | 7.4 | 4.1 | 1.8 |
| 1 | 3.9 | 8.8 | 9.8 | 7.3 | 4.1 | 1.8 |
| 2 | 2.0 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 0.9 |
| 3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| 4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5 | – | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.0%.
How many goals are KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt expected to score?
The model projects 0.99 expected goals for KFUM Oslo and 2.23 for Bodo/Glimt, a combined total of 3.22.
How confident is the prediction model for KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 65%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
KFUM Oslo's recent record stands at 5W 6D 4L from 15 games, a 1.40 PPG return, with D-L-L-W-W in the last five.
Bodo/Glimt, meanwhile, have gone 10W 3D 2L across 15 games — 2.20 PPG, with W-W-W-L-W in their last five.
The points-per-game comparison favours Bodo/Glimt by 0.80 — a real, if not enormous, edge over KFUM Oslo heading into this one.
Home & Away Splits
At home specifically, KFUM Oslo have managed 0W 4D 3L from their last 7 home games — 0.57 PPG in front of their own supporters. That actually lags their 1.40 PPG overall record — home advantage hasn't been translating into results for them lately.
Bodo/Glimt's away record stands at 5W 0D 2L across their last 7 away games, a 2.14 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
KFUM Oslo are averaging 1.47 goals scored and 1.47 conceded per game recently; Bodo/Glimt are on 2.27 scored and 0.87 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: KFUM Oslo have seen both teams score in 73% of their recent games; Bodo/Glimt in 60%.
Last 15 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
KFUM Oslo
Blended
Bodo/Glimt
Blended
KFUM Oslo (Home) vs Bodo/Glimt (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
KFUM Oslo
Blended
Bodo/Glimt
Blended
❓ KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt Form FAQs
What form are KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt in coming into this match?
KFUM Oslo have gone 5W 6D 4L in their last 15 games (1.40 PPG), while Bodo/Glimt have gone 10W 3D 2L in their last 15 (2.20 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — KFUM Oslo at home or Bodo/Glimt away?
Bodo/Glimt's away record (2.14 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — KFUM Oslo at home: 0.57 PPG; Bodo/Glimt away: 2.14 PPG.
Have KFUM Oslo or Bodo/Glimt been keeping clean sheets recently?
KFUM Oslo have kept a clean sheet in 27% of their recent games, Bodo/Glimt in 33%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
We have 5 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to May 2024 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in Eliteserien. The most recent was on 12 July 2026, roughly 4 months ago.
Records & Recent Trends
There's a clear recent trend here: Bodo/Glimt have taken the most recent 3 H2H results in our data.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bodo/Glimt won Bodo/Glimt 3-0 KFUM Oslo on 27 Apr 2025, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, KFUM Oslo have gone 0W 1D 2L from the 3 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against Bodo/Glimt — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 5 Meetings
0
KFUM Oslo
2
Draws
3
Bodo/Glimt
Recent Meetings
❓ KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt?
Across the 5 head-to-head matches in our data, KFUM Oslo have won 0, Bodo/Glimt have won 3, and 2 have been drawn.
When did KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 12 July 2026: KFUM Oslo 0-2 Bodo/Glimt.
Who has won more matches between KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt?
Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from the 5 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
KFUM Oslo see a goal before the break in 57% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 33% of those situations.
Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 86% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 29% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 33% of those situations.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — KFUM Oslo 71%, Bodo/Glimt 57% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 57% for KFUM Oslo and 71% for Bodo/Glimt. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 43% and 43% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: KFUM Oslo have failed to score in 29% of games.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = KFUM Oslo home games / Bodo/Glimt away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ KFUM Oslo vs Bodo/Glimt Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 71% of KFUM Oslo's games and 57% of Bodo/Glimt's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 57% of KFUM Oslo's matches and 71% of Bodo/Glimt's.
Do KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 57% of KFUM Oslo's recent matches and 86% of Bodo/Glimt's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
KFUM Oslo and Bodo/Glimt finished level at 1-1 at KFUM Arena, Regular Season - 16, in the Eliteserien. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting KFUM Oslo 0.99 xG and Bodo/Glimt 2.23 xG, a combined 3.22. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Bodo/Glimt landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of KFUM Oslo attack 0.80 / defence 1.30 against Bodo/Glimt attack 1.24 / defence 0.89, drawn from 15/46 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it KFUM Oslo 15% | Draw 19% | Bodo/Glimt 65%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 65%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 19% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 83% and landed. Over 3.5 was 40% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (KFUM Oslo 60%, Bodo/Glimt 60%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 67%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
KFUM Oslo's trading profile (15 games, 7 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 73% of their matches — today it did.
Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (15 games, 7 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.20 PPG against 1.40. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. KFUM Oslo (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 1.86 average — tighter than their form line. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.29 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.