Sign in Register

Chengdu Better City 2-1 Tianjin Teda – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 19

Kick-off

Fri 12 Jul 2024

13:00

Venue

Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours Chengdu Better City (65%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Chengdu Better City face Tianjin Teda.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Super League clash, Regular Season - 19 as Chengdu Better City welcome Tianjin Teda to Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park. Kick-off is set for Friday 12 July 2024 at 13:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Chengdu Better City — All Games: 6W 2D 2L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 2.00 points per game. Last five: W D W W W. They are averaging 2.90 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 8W 1D 1L at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park — 2.50 PPG. They are averaging 2.90 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 2.50 is noticeably stronger than their overall 2.00 — Chengdu Better City are significantly better at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, Tianjin Teda have recorded 3W 4D 3L from 10 outings — 1.30 PPG. Last five: L L D W D. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Tianjin Teda, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Super League this season, Tianjin Teda have posted 6W 1D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.90 PPG. They are averaging 2.10 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.90 exceeds their overall 1.30 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

On current form, Chengdu Better City have the edge — a 0.70 PPG advantage (2.00 vs 1.30) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

H2H Record

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 5 previous meetings, Chengdu Better City have won 2, Tianjin Teda 0, with 3 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 5 meetings have averaged 2.8 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 6 Apr 2024, ended 3–2 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 2.8 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Chengdu Better City trading profile (48 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 67% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%.

Tianjin Teda trading profile (48 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 60% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chengdu Better City 52% versus Tianjin Teda 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chengdu Better City 58% | Tianjin Teda 46%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chengdu Better City 2.50 xG and Tianjin Teda 1.23 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chengdu Better City attack 1.411 / defence 0.772 | Tianjin Teda attack 1.201 / defence 1.050. League average goals — home 1.690 / away 1.329. Chengdu Better City carry an above-average attack strength of 1.411 — their λ of 2.50 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Tianjin Teda have an above-average attack strength of 1.201 — the away xG of 1.23 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Chengdu Better City's defence rating of 0.772 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 48 Chengdu Better City games / 48 Tianjin Teda games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 65% | Draw 18% | Tianjin Teda 17%. Fair-value odds: Chengdu Better City 1.54 | Draw 5.56 | Tianjin Teda 5.88. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (65%) — a 48pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 72% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.74. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 72% — a total xG of 3.74 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (2.50 / 1.23) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 65% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 18% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.74 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 72% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 3.5 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 65% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Chengdu Better City 30% | Tianjin Teda 80% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (2W–3D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 40% vs Poisson 65%.
Goals H2H (2.80 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.74) both back Over 2.5 goals (72% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 80% and Poisson BTTS 65% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 2.00 vs 1.30 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Chengdu Better City Poisson xG (2.50) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.90) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Tianjin Teda Poisson xG (1.23) is below their form scoring rate (2.10) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Goals Form averages (~3.0 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.74) both support Over 2.5 goals at 72%.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 65% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Chengdu Better City at 65% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 72% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 19 | Venue: Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park • Kick-off: Friday 12 Jul 2024, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chengdu Better City 65% | Draw 18% | Tianjin Teda 17% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 72% | BTTS 65% | xG Chengdu Better City 2.50 / Tianjin Teda 1.23 • Poisson strength factors: Chengdu Better City attack 1.411 / def 0.772 | Tianjin Teda attack 1.201 / def 1.050 | league avg home 1.690 / away 1.329 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (65%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.50

Chengdu Better City xG

Expected Goals

1.23

Tianjin Teda xG

65%
18%
17%
Chengdu Better City Draw Tianjin Teda

65%

BTTS

89%

Over 1.5

72%

Over 2.5

51%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda kick off?

Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda kicked off at 13:00 on Friday 12 July 2024 at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

What was the final score in Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda?

Chengdu Better City 2 - 1 Tianjin Teda.

Where is Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda being played?

The match is being played at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park.

What competition is Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda part of?

Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda is a Regular Season - 19 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda?

Our statistical model gives Chengdu Better City a 65% chance of winning, Tianjin Teda a 17% chance, and a 18% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda will score (BTTS).

Will Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 72%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda?

Record (5 meetings): Chengdu Better City 2W | Draws 3 | Tianjin Teda 0W.

What form are Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda in?

Chengdu Better City (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.90 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-D-W-W-W. Tianjin Teda (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-L-D-W-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates Chengdu Better City's attack at 1.41x the league average against Tianjin Teda's defence at 1.05x — combine the two and it projects 2.50 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Tianjin Teda's attack versus Chengdu Better City's defence, projects 1.23 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 48/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 2-1 carries the highest individual probability at 9.2% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-1 (8.3%), 3-1 (7.7%). Together the top three scorelines make up 25% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

65%

Chengdu Better City

1.54

18%

Draw

5.44

17%

Tianjin Teda

5.94

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.2%

Home win

Most likely

3 – 1

7.7%

Home win

2 – 0

7.5%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.50

Chengdu Better City xG

Total xG

3.74

1.23

Tianjin Teda xG

65%
18%
17%
Chengdu Better CityDrawTianjin Teda

1.54

65%

Home win

5.44

18%

Draw

5.94

17%

Away win

Goals Markets

89%

Over 1.5

1.12

11%

Under 1.5

9.09

72%

Over 2.5

1.39

28%

Under 2.5

3.57

51%

Over 3.5

1.96

49%

Under 3.5

2.04

32%

Over 4.5

3.12

68%

Under 4.5

1.47

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.53

35%

BTTS No

2.89

Clean Sheet

29%

Chengdu Better City

3.43

8%

Tianjin Teda

12.22

Win to Nil

19%

Chengdu Better City

5.29

1%

Tianjin Teda

72.60

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 2.4 2.9 1.8 0.7 0.2 0.1
1 6.0 7.4 4.5 1.9 0.6 0.1
2 7.5 9.2 5.7 2.3 0.7 0.2
3 6.2 7.7 4.7 1.9 0.6 0.1
4 3.9 4.8 3.0 1.2 0.4 0.1
5 2.0 2.4 1.5 0.6 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.503
λ Away (xG) 1.232
Total xG 3.735
League avg home goals 1.690
League avg away goals 1.329
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.411
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.772
Tianjin Teda attack strength 1.201
Tianjin Teda defence strength 1.050
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 48 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda?

Our Poisson model rates 2-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.2%.

How many goals are Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda expected to score?

The model projects 2.50 expected goals for Chengdu Better City and 1.23 for Tianjin Teda, a combined total of 3.74.

How confident is the prediction model for Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 65%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 48 outings, Chengdu Better City have picked up 1.90 PPG on a 27W 10D 11L record — W-D-W-W-W across the most recent five. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Tianjin Teda's form line: 17W 21D 10L from 48 games, 1.50 PPG, last five L-L-D-W-D. The sample for Tianjin Teda is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Form-wise this is close to level: Chengdu Better City on 1.90 PPG, Tianjin Teda on 1.50. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Chengdu Better City have posted 2.17 PPG from 24 outings (16W 4D 4L).

On the road, Tianjin Teda have gone 11W 6D 7L from 24 away games — 1.62 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chengdu Better City come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Chengdu Better City are averaging 1.96 goals scored and 1.02 conceded per game recently; Tianjin Teda are on 1.42 scored and 1.10 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Tianjin Teda in 62%.

Defensively: Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 35% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 48 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
W D W W W
Tianjin Teda

Tianjin Teda

Blended
L L D W D
48 Played 48
27/10/11 W / D / L 17/21/10
1.90 Points Per Game 1.50
1.96 Avg Goals Scored 1.42
1.02 Avg Goals Conceded 1.10
2.98 Avg Goals / Game 2.52
17 Clean Sheets 14
25 BTTS 30
28 Over 2.5 Games 22
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–1 HT 2–1
26 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Jun
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
7–0 HT 3–0
26 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–1 HT 1–0
17 May
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 3–2
10 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–2
05 May
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–1
20 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–1
14 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–0 HT 1–0
10 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–0 HT 1–0
02 Mar
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 2–0
04 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
3–2 HT 1–1
29 Oct
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–0 HT 2–0
23 Oct
D
A Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
19 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–3 HT 0–3
04 Aug
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 1–1
29 Jul
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–1 HT 2–1
22 Jul
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Jul
W
H Henan Jianye
2–0 HT 0–0
11 Jul
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–3 HT 0–1
07 Jul
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 0–0
27 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 1–1
23 May
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
14 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Apr
D
A Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
Tianjin Teda

Tianjin Teda

D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 2–0
06 Jul
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Jun
D
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
14 Jun
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–3 HT 0–2
26 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
21 May
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–2 HT 1–0
17 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
11 May
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 0–1
04 May
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Apr
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
26 Apr
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–3 HT 1–1
19 Apr
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Apr
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–1 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
2–3 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Mar
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
4–0 HT 1–0
10 Mar
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Mar
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 2–0
04 Nov
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Oct
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
4–1 HT 2–0
22 Oct
D
H Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Sep
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Dalian Aerbin
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Sep
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 2–0
26 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–0
18 Aug
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–1
13 Aug
D
H Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Aug
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 1–1
03 Aug
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Jul
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–3 HT 0–1
21 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 1–0
16 Jul
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
11 Jul
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–1 HT 0–1
02 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 2–1
28 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Jun
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun
W
A Dalian Aerbin
1–0 HT 0–0
28 May
D
A Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–1
24 May
D
H Shandong Luneng
3–3 HT 2–3
20 May
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
14 May
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
10 May
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
06 May
D
A Changchun Yatai
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Apr
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–0 HT 2–0
26 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 2–1
21 Apr
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
16 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda in coming into this match?

Chengdu Better City have gone 27W 10D 11L in their last 48 games (1.90 PPG), while Tianjin Teda have gone 17W 21D 10L in their last 48 (1.50 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chengdu Better City at home or Tianjin Teda away?

Chengdu Better City's home record (2.17 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chengdu Better City at home: 2.17 PPG; Tianjin Teda away: 1.62 PPG.

Have Chengdu Better City or Tianjin Teda been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chengdu Better City have kept a clean sheet in 35% of their recent games, Tianjin Teda in 29%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda runs to 9 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to June 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 15 May 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

Chengdu Better City's record when hosting Tianjin Teda specifically: 2W 1D 1L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 9 Meetings

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

3

Draws

Tianjin Teda

2

Tianjin Teda

Recent Meetings

Tianjin Teda
1–2
15 May 26
Chengdu Better City
Tianjin Teda
2–1
18 Jul 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–2
02 Mar 25
Tianjin Teda
Chengdu Better City
2–1
12 Jul 24
Tianjin Teda
Tianjin Teda
2–3
06 Apr 24
Chengdu Better City
Tianjin Teda
2–2
29 Sep 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
0–0
08 Jun 23
Tianjin Teda
Chengdu Better City
2–1
08 Jul 22
Tianjin Teda
Tianjin Teda
1–1
16 Jun 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda?

From 9 meetings on record, Chengdu Better City have won 4, Tianjin Teda have won 2, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda last play each other?

They last met on 15 May 2026, when Tianjin Teda 1-2 Chengdu Better City.

Who has won more matches between Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 9 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 54% of the time.

Tianjin Teda are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 33% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 17% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chengdu Better City 46%, Tianjin Teda 67% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 67% (Chengdu Better City) and 50% (Tianjin Teda). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 42% and 25% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Chengdu Better City keep a clean sheet in 42% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chengdu Better City home games / Tianjin Teda away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 39/48
(81.2%)
20/24
(83.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/48
(45.8%)
13/24
(54.2%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/9
(77.8%)
3/4
(75%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 3/9
(33.3%)
2/4
(50%)
Winning at HT 21/48
(43.8%)
13/24
(54.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/48
(4.2%)
1/24
(4.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/48
(2.1%)
0/24
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 25/48
(52.1%)
11/24
(45.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 28/48
(58.3%)
16/24
(66.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/48
(37.5%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Clean Sheet 17/48
(35.4%)
10/24
(41.7%)
Failed to Score 8/48
(16.7%)
4/24
(16.7%)
Tianjin Teda Tianjin Teda Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(24 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 33/48
(68.8%)
18/24
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 16/48
(33.3%)
8/24
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/15
(60%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/15
(26.7%)
2/6
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 16/48
(33.3%)
8/24
(33.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/48
(10.4%)
2/24
(8.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/48
(14.6%)
4/24
(16.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/48
(62.5%)
16/24
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 22/48
(45.8%)
12/24
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 13/48
(27.1%)
6/24
(25%)
Clean Sheet 14/48
(29.2%)
6/24
(25%)
Failed to Score 10/48
(20.8%)
3/24
(12.5%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chengdu Better City play Tianjin Teda?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 46% of Chengdu Better City's games and 67% of Tianjin Teda's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Chengdu Better City vs Tianjin Teda usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 67% of Chengdu Better City's matches and 50% of Tianjin Teda's.

Do Chengdu Better City and Tianjin Teda tend to score early?

Chengdu Better City have had a goal before half-time in 83% of their recent matches, Tianjin Teda in 75% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Chengdu Better City edge out Tianjin Teda 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Tianjin Teda 2-1 at Chengdu Phoenix Mountain Sports Park, Regular Season - 19, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chengdu Better City 2.50 xG and Tianjin Teda 1.23 xG, a combined 3.74. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chengdu Better City attack 1.41 / defence 0.77 against Tianjin Teda attack 1.20 / defence 1.05, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chengdu Better City 65% | Draw 18% | Tianjin Teda 17%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 65%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 72%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 89% and landed. Over 3.5 was 51% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chengdu Better City 58%, Tianjin Teda 46%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (48 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and conceded here.

Tianjin Teda's trading profile (48 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chengdu Better City 1.90 PPG, Tianjin Teda 1.50 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Chengdu Better City win broke the near-deadlock. Tianjin Teda (home/away splits) shipped 2 against a 1.08 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A strong night for the model: the result sat comfortably inside what the pre-match data projected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 72% Over 2.5 probability, 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 65% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 52% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.