🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Khorfakkan's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Saqr bin Mohammad al Qassimi Stadium, Regular Season - 13, as Khorfakkan and Al Nasr drew 0-0 in the Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Khorfakkan 1.52 xG and Al Nasr 1.87 xG, a combined 3.39. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Khorfakkan fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Al Nasr landed 1.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Khorfakkan attack 1.04 / defence 1.22 against Al Nasr attack 1.10 / defence 1.13, drawn from 38/38 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Khorfakkan 31% | Draw 22% | Al Nasr 46%, with Al Nasr to win its most likely call at 46%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 22% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 66%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 85% and missed. Over 3.5 was 44% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 66% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 63% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Khorfakkan 63%, Al Nasr 63%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 64%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Khorfakkan's trading profile (38 games, 19 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did not.

Al Nasr's trading profile (38 games, 19 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 66% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Khorfakkan 1.16 PPG, Al Nasr 1.47 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Khorfakkan (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.63 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.74 average — tighter than their form line. Al Nasr (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.63 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.89 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights