🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shock result as Al-Wasl FC defy the odds to beat Al Nasr 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Al-Wasl FC beat Al Nasr 0-1 at Al Maktoum Stadium, Regular Season - 16, in the Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Al Nasr 1.93 xG and Al-Wasl FC 1.45 xG, a combined 3.38. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Al Nasr fell 1.9 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Al Nasr attack 1.11 / defence 1.01 against Al-Wasl FC attack 0.97 / defence 0.97, drawn from 41/41 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Al Nasr 48% | Draw 23% | Al-Wasl FC 29%, with Al Nasr to win its most likely call at 48%. The actual Al-Wasl FC win had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 66%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 86% and missed. Over 3.5 was 44% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 66% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 68% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Al Nasr 66%, Al-Wasl FC 71%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Al Nasr's trading profile (41 games, 20 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did not.

Al-Wasl FC's trading profile (41 games, 20 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Al-Wasl FC arrived the stronger side — 2.15 PPG against 1.59. That form edge translated into the three points. Al Nasr (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.65 scoring average — below par going forward. Al-Wasl FC (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.50 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.40 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights