🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at LNZ Cherkasy's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Cherkasy Arena, Regular Season - 27, as LNZ Cherkasy and Dynamo Kyiv drew 0-0 in the Premier League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting LNZ Cherkasy 1.70 xG and Dynamo Kyiv 1.89 xG, a combined 3.58. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. LNZ Cherkasy fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Dynamo Kyiv landed 1.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of LNZ Cherkasy attack 1.08 / defence 0.92 against Dynamo Kyiv attack 1.67 / defence 1.24, drawn from 56/56 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it LNZ Cherkasy 35% | Draw 23% | Dynamo Kyiv 43%, with Dynamo Kyiv to win its most likely call at 43%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 23% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 69%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 88% and missed. Over 3.5 was 48% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 70% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (LNZ Cherkasy 30%, Dynamo Kyiv 61%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

LNZ Cherkasy's trading profile (56 games, 28 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 38% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Dynamo Kyiv's trading profile (56 games, 28 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Dynamo Kyiv arrived the stronger side — 2.09 PPG against 1.50. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. LNZ Cherkasy (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.07 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.89 average — tighter than their form line. Dynamo Kyiv (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.25 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.07 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights