🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Prachuap at 71%, yet other data sources diverge — this Prachuap vs Chiangrai United fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Prachuap and Chiangrai United meet at Sam Ao Stadium in Thai League 1, Regular Season - 19. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 26 January 2025 at 11:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Prachuap have collected 1.40 PPG across 10 Thai League 1 outings this season: 3W 5D 2L. Last five: D D L D L. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.20 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Prachuap, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Prachuap's home record at Sam Ao Stadium: 6W 4D 0L from 10 Thai League 1 appearances (2.20 PPG). They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Sam Ao Stadium. Their home PPG of 2.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.40 — Prachuap are significantly better at Sam Ao Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Chiangrai United's overall Thai League 1 record this term: 4W 1D 5L from 10 games (1.30 PPG). Last five: L W W L W. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Chiangrai United, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chiangrai United's away record: 1W 1D 8L from 10 road trips in Thai League 1 this season (0.40 PPG). Away from home they average 0.40 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel. Their away PPG of 0.40 is notably below their overall 1.30 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.40 for Prachuap, 1.30 for Chiangrai United — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 7 meetings: Prachuap 3W, Chiangrai United 2W, 2D.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 2.9 goals per game across 7 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 31 Aug 2024, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 2.9 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

Prachuap goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (48 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games).

Chiangrai United goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (48 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 54% of the time; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Prachuap 54% versus Chiangrai United 44%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Prachuap 46% | Chiangrai United 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Prachuap 2.37 xG and Chiangrai United 0.84 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Prachuap attack 1.005 / defence 0.939 | Chiangrai United attack 0.753 / defence 1.353. League average goals — home 1.745 / away 1.189. Chiangrai United bring a strong defensive rating of 1.353 — this is suppressing Prachuap's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 48 Prachuap games / 48 Chiangrai United games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Prachuap 71% | Draw 18% | Chiangrai United 11%. Fair-value odds: Prachuap 1.41 | Draw 5.56 | Chiangrai United 9.09. The model has a clear lean to Prachuap (71%) — a 60pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 62% | BTTS probability 52% | Total xG 3.21. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 62% — the 3.21 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 52% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Prachuap as the most likely outcome at 71% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 18% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.21 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 62% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.9 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 52% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Prachuap 40% | Chiangrai United 20% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights