🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates FC Thun at 47% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Servette FC vs FC Thun encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Servette FC and FC Thun meet at Stade de Genève in Super League, Regular Season - 13. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 8 November 2025 at 19:30 UTC.

Current Form

Servette FC's overall Super League record this term: 4W 2D 4L from 10 games (1.40 PPG). Last five: L L W W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.80 goals per game, with 1.70 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Servette FC, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Stade de Genève, Servette FC have gone 4W 4D 2L this season (10 games, 1.60 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.90 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

FC Thun have collected 2.20 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 7W 1D 2L. Last five: W W W W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.10 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for FC Thun, so this record blends games from this season and last.

FC Thun away from home this season: 5W 0D 1L from 6 away games — 2.50 PPG on the road. They are averaging 2.17 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 67% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

On a straight form reading, FC Thun are the stronger side — 0.80 PPG clear of the hosts (2.20 vs 1.40). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Servette FC have seen both teams score in 70% of their games, FC Thun in 67%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 1 head-to-head meetings have produced 0 wins for Servette FC, 1 for FC Thun and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.0 per game across 1 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 18 Oct 2025, ended 1–3 with FC Thun winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Servette FC — key trading statistics (12 games, 6 at home): they score before half-time in 100% of fixtures in home games; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 83% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 58%.

FC Thun — key trading statistics (12 games, 6 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; they lead at the break 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 83% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Servette FC 75% and FC Thun 75% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Servette FC 83% | FC Thun 83%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Servette FC 1.48 xG and FC Thun 1.86 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Servette FC attack 0.891 / defence 1.140 | FC Thun attack 1.210 / defence 0.857. League average goals — home 1.938 / away 1.351. FC Thun have an above-average attack strength of 1.210 — the away xG of 1.86 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 45 Servette FC games / 12 FC Thun games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Servette FC 31% | Draw 22% | FC Thun 47%. Fair-value odds: Servette FC 3.23 | Draw 4.55 | FC Thun 2.13. FC Thun hold a narrow Poisson edge at 47% — the draw (22%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 65% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.34. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 65% — a total xG of 3.34 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.48 / 1.86) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, FC Thun are the pick at 47% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 22% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on FC Thun if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.34 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 65% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 65% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Servette FC 70% | FC Thun 67% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights