🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Varbergs BoIS FC at 42%, yet other data sources diverge — this Varbergs BoIS FC vs IK brage fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Paskbergsvallen plays host to Varbergs BoIS FC versus IK brage in Superettan, Regular Season - 29. Kick-off: Saturday 1 November 2025 at 14:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Varbergs BoIS FC have collected 1.50 PPG across 10 Superettan outings this season: 3W 6D 1L. Last five: D D L D D. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.30 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

Varbergs BoIS FC at Paskbergsvallen this season: 3W 5D 2L from 10 home games — 1.40 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

IK brage's overall Superettan record this term: 3W 1D 6L from 10 games (1.00 PPG). Last five: L L L L W. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 2.20. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

IK brage away from home this season: 3W 4D 3L from 10 away games — 1.30 PPG on the road. They are averaging 1.80 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The points-per-game gap of 0.50 in Varbergs BoIS FC's favour (1.50 vs 1.00) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Varbergs BoIS FC have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, IK brage in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Varbergs BoIS FC lead 0W to 2W over the last 3 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 3 previous contests averaged 1.3 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 13 Apr 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 1.3 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading Data

Varbergs BoIS FC goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (58 games, 29 at home): they score before half-time in 66% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (home games).

IK brage goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (58 games, 29 at away): they score before half-time in 59% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 41% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Varbergs BoIS FC 66% versus IK brage 52%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Varbergs BoIS FC 55% | IK brage 48%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Varbergs BoIS FC 1.44 xG and IK brage 1.20 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Varbergs BoIS FC attack 0.902 / defence 0.946 | IK brage attack 1.056 / defence 1.039. League average goals — home 1.537 / away 1.196. Data: 58 Varbergs BoIS FC games / 58 IK brage games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Varbergs BoIS FC 42% | Draw 27% | IK brage 31%. Fair-value odds: Varbergs BoIS FC 2.38 | Draw 3.70 | IK brage 3.23. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 54% | Total xG 2.64. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.64 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 54% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

IK brage lead the H2H ledger, but Varbergs BoIS FC carry stronger current form — do not let history alone dictate your assessment.

On the Poisson output, Varbergs BoIS FC are the pick at 42% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Varbergs BoIS FC if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.64 combined xG gives a 49% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by H2H averaging 1.3 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 54%. Form rates corroborate: Varbergs BoIS FC 60% | IK brage 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights