Fixture360 logo BETA
Sign in Register
Superettan · Regular Season - 15

Kick-off

Sun 19 Jul 2026

13:00

Venue

Finnvedsvallen

Competition

Superettan

Sweden

Status

NS
📋

Poisson model favours Ljungskile SK (41%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as IFK Varnamo face Ljungskile SK.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Finnvedsvallen plays host to IFK Varnamo versus Ljungskile SK in Superettan, Regular Season - 15. Kick-off: Sunday 19 July 2026 at 13:00 UTC.

Market Odds

The market is almost split down the middle: IFK Varnamo 2.64 (35% implied) against Ljungskile SK 2.41 (38% implied), with the draw priced at 3.38 (27%).

When markets are this close, the risk-reward on an outright win is limited. Double Chance markets covering two of the three outcomes, or Asian Handicap 0 on the side your analysis backs, are both worth pricing up.

Form & Momentum

IFK Varnamo have collected 0.10 PPG across 10 Superettan outings this season: 0W 1D 9L. Last five: L L L L L. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 2.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.40 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. This season is still relatively young for IFK Varnamo, so this record blends games from this season and last.

At home at Finnvedsvallen, IFK Varnamo have gone 2W 2D 6L this season (10 games, 0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 0.80 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.10 — IFK Varnamo are significantly better at Finnvedsvallen than their overall form suggests.

Ljungskile SK (all games): 3W 3D 4L across 10 Superettan outings this term — 1.20 points per game. Last five: L D D D W. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Ljungskile SK, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Ljungskile SK's away record: 1W 3D 3L from 7 road trips in Superettan this season (0.86 PPG). Away from home they average 1.14 goals scored and 1.14 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 57% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

On a straight form reading, Ljungskile SK are the stronger side — 1.10 PPG clear of the hosts (1.20 vs 0.10). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

H2H History

Ljungskile SK hold the superior head-to-head record in this fixture, claiming 4 wins from 4 meetings. The hosts have won just 0 times in that span.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.2 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 29 Sep 2019, ended 0–3 with Ljungskile SK winning.

It is worth noting that Ljungskile SK have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 4 wins from 4 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Statistical Overview

IFK Varnamo's cumulative Superettan record this campaign: 3W 1D 10L from 14 matches. Their scoring output is 1.1 per match with 2.2 conceded on average. Biggest win: 3-0 (H) / 0-1 (A). Heaviest defeat: 0-2 (H) / 6-0 (A). Their best winning run this season has been 3 consecutive games. Worst losing run: 3 consecutive games. They have failed to score in 6 games this season. 2 clean sheets this season (1 at home, 1 away). Scored 2+ goals in 2 of 14 games (14%). Most used formation: 4-4-2. Discipline: 1.5 yellow cards per game, 0.07 reds per game.

Ljungskile SK have played 14 games this season, recording 4W 4D 6L. Attacking returns: 1.3 goals per game; defensive: 1.3 conceded per outing. Biggest win: 4-1 (H) / 1-4 (A). Heaviest defeat: 1-3 (H) / 2-1 (A). Their best winning run this season has been 2 consecutive games. Longest draw run: 3 games. Worst losing run: 2 consecutive games. They have failed to score in 5 games this season. 2 clean sheets this season (1 at home, 1 away). Scored 2+ goals in 3 of 14 games (21%). Penalties this season: 1 scored / 0 missed from 1 awarded. Most used formation: 4-2-3-1. Discipline: 1.9 yellow cards per game.

Ljungskile SK have kept their defensive record in better shape, conceding 1.30 per game versus 2.20 for the hosts. Ljungskile SK have been awarded 1 penalty this season (1 scored).

Where They Stand

The standings have Ljungskile SK (12th, 16 pts) 3 places above IFK Varnamo (15th, 10 pts) — a 6-point gap in Superettan.

IFK Varnamo's home record this season stands at 2W 1D 3L. Away from home, Ljungskile SK have posted 1W 3D 3L in Superettan this season. IFK Varnamo: Relegation.

Trading Data

IFK Varnamo goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (14 games, 6 at home): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 33% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 50%; they fail to score in 43% of games.

Ljungskile SK goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (14 games, 6 at away): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 60% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 36%; they fail to score in 36% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — IFK Varnamo 43% versus Ljungskile SK 57%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (IFK Varnamo 64% | Ljungskile SK 43%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects IFK Varnamo 1.02 xG and Ljungskile SK 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: IFK Varnamo attack 0.755 / defence 1.053 | Ljungskile SK attack 0.808 / defence 0.945. League average goals — home 1.428 / away 1.458. IFK Varnamo's attack strength of 0.755 is below the league average — the 1.02 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 14 IFK Varnamo games / 14 Ljungskile SK games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: IFK Varnamo 30% | Draw 28% | Ljungskile SK 41%. Fair-value odds: IFK Varnamo 3.33 | Draw 3.57 | Ljungskile SK 2.44. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 39% | BTTS probability 45% | Total xG 2.26. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 61% — total xG of 2.26 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 45% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Ljungskile SK as the most likely outcome at 41% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. The model's read is broadly in line with the market at 2.41 (fair-implied 38% vs Poisson 41%). Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Ljungskile SK if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.26 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 39% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence. The market (2.09, fair-implied 45%) is broadly in line with the Poisson probability.

Poisson assigns a 45% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: IFK Varnamo 50% | Ljungskile SK 57%. Market pricing (2.26, fair-implied 41%) is broadly in line with the Poisson read on BTTS.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Ljungskile SK have been the dominant side historically, winning 4 of 4 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Ljungskile SK — H2H win rate 100% vs Poisson 41%.
Form Ljungskile SK lead on PPG: 1.20 vs 0.10 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Ljungskile SK — Ljungskile SK at 41% win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 39% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
Market Over 2.5: Poisson 39% vs market fair-implied 55%.
Market BTTS Yes: Poisson 45% vs market fair-implied 59%.
Market Odds are very tight between the two sides — the market sees this as a 50/50 contest.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK | Competition: Superettan, Regular Season - 15 | Venue: Finnvedsvallen • Kick-off: Sunday 19 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC • Manager edge: Ljungskile SK led by L. Mattsson • Squad availability: no confirmed absences reported for either side • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

⚔️ Head-to-Head History

• Record (4 meetings): IFK Varnamo 0W | Draws 0 | Ljungskile SK 4W • Goals trend: 2.25 goals/game | Total H2H goals: IFK Varnamo 0 – 9 Ljungskile SK • H2H markets: BTTS 0% | Over 2.5 25% | Win rates: IFK Varnamo 0% / Draw 0% / Ljungskile SK 100% • Historical edge: Ljungskile SK dominant — 4W from 4 meetings (100% win rate) • H2H vs Poisson: both agree — Ljungskile SK favoured. H2H win rate 100%, Poisson win probability 41% • Goals: H2H average 2.25/game (25% Over 2.5 historically), Poisson total xG 2.26 (39% Over 2.5) — broadly consistent • BTTS: H2H rate 0%, Poisson probability 45% — no strong aligned signal

📈 Recent Form

• IFK Varnamo (all comps): 0W-1D-9L in 10 | 0.10 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 2.40 | L5 L-L-L-L-L • Ljungskile SK (all comps): 3W-3D-4L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-D-D-D-W • IFK Varnamo home split: 0.80 PPG from 10 | GF 1.10 / GA 2.00 | CS 1 • Ljungskile SK away split: 0.86 PPG from 7 | GF 1.14 / GA 1.14 | CS 1 • Form edge: Ljungskile SK lead by 1.10 PPG (1.20 vs 0.10) • xG vs form (IFK Varnamo): Poisson xG of 1.02 aligns with form scoring rate of 1.10 — consistent corroboration • xG vs form (Ljungskile SK): Poisson xG of 1.24 aligns with form scoring rate of 1.14 — consistent corroboration • Goals margin: form ~1.9 goals/game, Poisson xG sum 2.26 (39% Over 2.5) — no strong lean either way • BTTS: mixed signals — form blend ~54% BTTS rate, Poisson probability 45% — no strong positional edge • Form vs Poisson alignment: form and model agree on Ljungskile SK — Ljungskile SK at 41% Poisson win probability

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: IFK Varnamo 30% | Draw 28% | Ljungskile SK 41% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 39% | BTTS 45% | xG IFK Varnamo 1.02 / Ljungskile SK 1.24 • Poisson strength factors: IFK Varnamo attack 0.755 / def 1.053 | Ljungskile SK attack 0.808 / def 0.945 | league avg home 1.428 / away 1.458 • Poisson stance: Ljungskile SK (41%) — low confidence — close contest

🎲 Betting Market Intelligence

• 1X2 market: IFK Varnamo 2.64 (impl 35%) | Draw 3.38 (impl 27%) | Ljungskile SK 2.41 (impl 38%) • Market favourite: Ljungskile SK at 2.41 • Poisson vs market alignment: both point to Ljungskile SK — Poisson 41% vs market implied 38% — tight pricing suggests an efficient market; no meaningful edge detected • Goals market: Over 2.5 1.70 (impl 59%) / Under 2.5 2.09 (impl 48%) | Poisson Over 2.5 probability 39% • Goals: Poisson rates Over 2.5 at 39% vs the market's fair-implied 55% (16pp gap) — the model sees Over 2.5 as less likely than the market's pricing reflects. • BTTS market: BTTS Yes 1.56 (impl 64%) / No 2.26 (impl 44%) | Poisson BTTS probability 45% • BTTS: Poisson rates Yes at 45% vs the market's fair-implied 59% (14pp gap) — the model sees BTTS Yes as less likely than the market's pricing reflects. • Market shape: near-coinflip pricing between the two sides — market sees this as a 50/50 contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.02

IFK Varnamo xG

Expected Goals

1.24

Ljungskile SK xG

30%
28%
41%
IFK Varnamo Draw Ljungskile SK

45%

BTTS

66%

Over 1.5

39%

Over 2.5

19%

Over 3.5

πŸ”’

Full score probability matrix is a Premium feature

Upgrade to see the exact probability of every scoreline from 0-0 to 6-6, not just the headline 1X2 split.

Upgrade to Premium

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK kick off?

IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK is scheduled to kick off at 13:00 on Sunday 19 July 2026 at Finnvedsvallen.

Where is IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK being played?

The match is being played at Finnvedsvallen.

What competition is IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK part of?

IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK is a Regular Season - 15 fixture in the Superettan (Sweden).

Who is favourite to win IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK?

Our statistical model gives IFK Varnamo a 30% chance of winning, Ljungskile SK a 41% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making Ljungskile SK the favourite.

Will both teams score in IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK?

Our model estimates a 45% probability that both IFK Varnamo and Ljungskile SK will score (BTTS).

Will IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 39%.

What is the head-to-head record between IFK Varnamo and Ljungskile SK?

• Record (4 meetings): IFK Varnamo 0W | Draws 0 | Ljungskile SK 4W • Goals trend: 2.25 goals/game | Total H2H goals: IFK Varnamo 0 – 9 Ljungskile SK • H2H markets: BTTS 0% | Over 2.5 25% | Win rates: IFK Varnamo 0% / Draw 0% / Ljungskile SK 100% • Historical edge: Ljungskile SK dominant — 4W from 4 meetings (100% win rate) • H2H vs Poisson: both agree — Ljungskile SK favoured. H2H win rate 100%, Poisson win probability 41% • Goals: H2H average 2.25/game (25% Over 2.5 historically), Poisson total xG 2.26 (39% Over 2.5) — broadly consistent • BTTS: H2H rate 0%, Poisson probability 45% — no strong aligned signal

What form are IFK Varnamo and Ljungskile SK in?

• IFK Varnamo (all comps): 0W-1D-9L in 10 | 0.10 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 2.40 | L5 L-L-L-L-L • Ljungskile SK (all comps): 3W-3D-4L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-D-D-D-W • IFK Varnamo home split: 0.80 PPG from 10 | GF 1.10 / GA 2.00 | CS 1 • Ljungskile SK away split: 0.86 PPG from 7 | GF 1.14 / GA 1.14 | CS 1 • Form edge: Ljungskile SK lead by 1.10 PPG (1.20 vs 0.10) • xG vs form (IFK Varnamo): Poisson xG of 1.02 aligns with form scoring rate of 1.10 — consistent corroboration • xG vs form (Ljungskile SK): Poisson xG of 1.24 aligns with form scoring rate of 1.14 — consistent corroboration • Goals margin: form ~1.9 goals/game, Poisson xG sum 2.26 (39% Over 2.5) — no strong lean either way • BTTS: mixed signals — form blend ~54% BTTS rate, Poisson probability 45% — no strong positional edge • Form vs Poisson alignment: form and model agree on Ljungskile SK — Ljungskile SK at 41% Poisson win probability

What do the betting odds say about IFK Varnamo vs Ljungskile SK?

• 1X2 market: IFK Varnamo 2.64 (impl 35%) | Draw 3.38 (impl 27%) | Ljungskile SK 2.41 (impl 38%) • Market favourite: Ljungskile SK at 2.41 • Poisson vs market alignment: both point to Ljungskile SK — Poisson 41% vs market implied 38% — tight pricing suggests an efficient market; no meaningful edge detected • Goals market: Over 2.5 1.70 (impl 59%) / Under 2.5 2.09 (impl 48%) | Poisson Over 2.5 probability 39% • Goals: Poisson rates Over 2.5 at 39% vs the market's fair-implied 55% (16pp gap) — the model sees Over 2.5 as less likely than the market's pricing reflects. • BTTS market: BTTS Yes 1.56 (impl 64%) / No 2.26 (impl 44%) | Poisson BTTS probability 45% • BTTS: Poisson rates Yes at 45% vs the market's fair-implied 59% (14pp gap) — the model sees BTTS Yes as less likely than the market's pricing reflects. • Market shape: near-coinflip pricing between the two sides — market sees this as a 50/50 contest