🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates GIF Sundsvall at 39% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this GIF Sundsvall vs Sandviken encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Sandviken make the trip to NP3 Arena to face GIF Sundsvall in Superettan, Regular Season - 18. The match kicks off on Saturday 9 August 2025 at 12:00 UTC.

Current Form

GIF Sundsvall's overall Superettan record this term: 5W 3D 2L from 10 games (1.80 PPG). Last five: W D W D L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.10 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. This season is still relatively young for GIF Sundsvall, so this record blends games from this season and last.

GIF Sundsvall at NP3 Arena this season: 3W 4D 3L from 10 home games — 1.30 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 1.30 lags behind their overall 1.80 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at NP3 Arena this season.

Sandviken (all games): 4W 2D 4L across 10 Superettan outings this term — 1.40 points per game. Last five: W W L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Sandviken, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Sandviken have gone 3W 2D 5L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.80 PPG for GIF Sundsvall against 1.40 for Sandviken. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — GIF Sundsvall register both teams scoring in 70% of relevant games, Sandviken in 70%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — GIF Sundsvall lead 2W to 0W over the last 3 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 3 previous contests averaged 1.3 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 27 May 2025, ended 1–0 with GIF Sundsvall winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.3 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading & In-Play

GIF Sundsvall — key trading statistics (47 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 52% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (home games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

Sandviken — key trading statistics (47 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 61% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — GIF Sundsvall 49% versus Sandviken 55%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (GIF Sundsvall 47% | Sandviken 64%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects GIF Sundsvall 1.35 xG and Sandviken 1.21 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: GIF Sundsvall attack 0.913 / defence 1.018 | Sandviken attack 0.885 / defence 1.037. League average goals — home 1.426 / away 1.344. Data: 47 GIF Sundsvall games / 47 Sandviken games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: GIF Sundsvall 39% | Draw 28% | Sandviken 33%. Fair-value odds: GIF Sundsvall 2.56 | Draw 3.57 | Sandviken 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 47% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.56. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 47%/53% — the total xG of 2.56 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is GIF Sundsvall at 39% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on GIF Sundsvall if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.56 combined xG gives a 47% probability to Under 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by H2H averaging 1.3 goals per meeting — though form averaging only 3.0 goals per game points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 53%. Form rates corroborate: GIF Sundsvall 70% | Sandviken 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights