🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Falkenbergs FF run riot with a 4-0 hammering of Trelleborg.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Falkenbergs FF beat Trelleborg 4-0 at Falcon Alkoholfri Arena, Regular Season - 9, in the Superettan. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Falkenbergs FF 1.24 xG and Trelleborg 0.82 xG, a combined 2.06. The scoreboard read 4-0 for 4 actual goals. Falkenbergs FF beat their projection by 2.8 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Trelleborg landed 0.8 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Falkenbergs FF attack 0.93 / defence 0.98 against Trelleborg attack 0.65 / defence 0.97, drawn from 8/38 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Falkenbergs FF 46% | Draw 29% | Trelleborg 25%, with Falkenbergs FF to win its most likely call at 46%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 61% and landed. Over 3.5 was 15% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 40% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 75% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Falkenbergs FF 100%, Trelleborg 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 25%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Form vs Result

On form, Trelleborg arrived the stronger side — 1.50 PPG against 0.50. Form was overturned, with Falkenbergs FF winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Falkenbergs FF scored 4 against a 1.00 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 2.50 average — tighter than their form line. Trelleborg managed 0 against a 1.50 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 0.50 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights