🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Falkenbergs FF and Oddevold share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Falcon Alkoholfri Arena, Regular Season - 4, as Falkenbergs FF and Oddevold drew 2-2 in the Superettan. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Falkenbergs FF 1.01 xG and Oddevold 1.61 xG, a combined 2.62. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Falkenbergs FF beat their projection by 1.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Falkenbergs FF attack 0.98 / defence 1.21 against Oddevold attack 1.09 / defence 0.87, drawn from 3/33 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Falkenbergs FF 24% | Draw 25% | Oddevold 51%, with Oddevold to win its most likely call at 51%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 49%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 74% and landed. Over 3.5 was 27% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 100% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Falkenbergs FF 100%, Oddevold 100%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Form vs Result

On form, Oddevold arrived the stronger side — 1.50 PPG against 0.50. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Falkenbergs FF scored 2 against a 1.00 average — above their attacking norm. Oddevold scored 2 against a 1.00 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights