🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Mjallby AIF (48%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Mjallby AIF face Degerfors IF.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Mjallby AIF and Degerfors IF meet at Strandvallen in Allsvenskan, Regular Season - 6. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 27 April 2025 at 13:00 UTC.

Form

Mjallby AIF (all games): 4W 5D 1L across 10 Allsvenskan fixtures this term — 1.70 PPG. Last five: W W D D W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 0.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Defensively, conceding just 0.80 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Mjallby AIF at Strandvallen this season: 6W 3D 1L from 10 home games — 2.10 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.70 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 90% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Degerfors IF's overall Allsvenskan record this term: 1W 3D 6L from 10 games (0.60 PPG). Last five: D L D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Degerfors IF haven't played a Allsvenskan game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

Degerfors IF's form when playing away from home: 2W 3D 5L across 10 road games this term (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Form favours the hosts. Mjallby AIF's 1.70 PPG return is 1.10 points per game ahead of Degerfors IF's 0.60 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Mjallby AIF have seen both teams score in 90% of their games, Degerfors IF in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Historically, Mjallby AIF have had the better of this match-up — 5 wins from 6 meetings, with Degerfors IF managing just 0 victories and 1 draws shared.

The 6 previous meetings have averaged 1.8 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 12 Nov 2023, ended 2–1 with Mjallby AIF winning.

The historical record gives Mjallby AIF a meaningful edge here — 5 wins from 6 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading

Mjallby AIF half-time and goal-timing data (30 games, 15 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 80% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (home games).

Degerfors IF half-time and goal-timing data (30 games, 15 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Mjallby AIF 67% and Degerfors IF 60% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Mjallby AIF 57% | Degerfors IF 63%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Mjallby AIF 2.08 xG and Degerfors IF 1.66 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Mjallby AIF attack 1.202 / defence 0.935 | Degerfors IF attack 1.378 / defence 1.235. League average goals — home 1.399 / away 1.288. Degerfors IF bring a strong defensive rating of 1.235 — this is suppressing Mjallby AIF's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Degerfors IF have an above-average attack strength of 1.378 — the away xG of 1.66 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 35 Mjallby AIF games / 5 Degerfors IF games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Mjallby AIF 48% | Draw 21% | Degerfors IF 31%. Fair-value odds: Mjallby AIF 2.08 | Draw 4.76 | Degerfors IF 3.23. Mjallby AIF hold a narrow Poisson edge at 48% — the draw (21%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 72% | BTTS probability 71% | Total xG 3.73. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 72% — a total xG of 3.73 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 71% reflects that both xG figures (2.08 / 1.66) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Mjallby AIF are the pick at 48% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.73 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 72% probability — marginal — conflicting signals conviction, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 71% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Mjallby AIF 90% | Degerfors IF 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights