🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Malmo FF run riot with a 0-4 hammering of Halmstad.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Malmo FF beat Halmstad 0-4 at Örjans Vall, Regular Season - 20, in the Allsvenskan. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Halmstad 0.93 xG and Malmo FF 1.51 xG, a combined 2.45. The scoreboard read 0-4 for 4 actual goals. Halmstad fell 0.9 short of their projected output. Malmo FF outscored their 1.51 projection by 2.5. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Halmstad attack 0.83 / defence 1.07 against Malmo FF attack 1.09 / defence 0.82, drawn from 49/49 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Halmstad 23% | Draw 27% | Malmo FF 50%, with Malmo FF to win its most likely call at 50%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 44%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 70% and landed. Over 3.5 was 23% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Halmstad 49%, Malmo FF 57%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 45%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Halmstad's trading profile (49 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 37% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Malmo FF's trading profile (49 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Malmo FF arrived the stronger side — 2.00 PPG against 1.04. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Halmstad (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.20 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 1.28 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Malmo FF (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.68 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.08 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights