🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Gais's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Gamla Ullevi, Regular Season - 14, as Gais and Malmo FF drew 0-0 in the Allsvenskan. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gais 1.13 xG and Malmo FF 1.08 xG, a combined 2.20. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gais fell 1.1 short of their projected output. Malmo FF landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gais attack 0.93 / defence 0.82 against Malmo FF attack 1.00 / defence 0.91, drawn from 43/44 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gais 36% | Draw 31% | Malmo FF 33%, with Gais to win its most likely call at 36%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 38%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 65% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 45% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gais 44%, Malmo FF 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gais's trading profile (43 games, 20 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Malmo FF's trading profile (43 games, 20 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 46% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gais 1.60 PPG, Malmo FF 1.98 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Gais (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.40 scoring average — below par going forward. Malmo FF (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.40 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.20 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights