🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Dominant Gais run riot with a 3-0 hammering of Halmstad.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gais beat Halmstad 3-0 at Gamla Ullevi, Regular Season - 17, in the Allsvenskan. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gais 1.75 xG and Halmstad 0.73 xG, a combined 2.47. The scoreboard read 3-0 for 3 actual goals. Gais beat their projection by 1.3 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gais attack 0.99 / defence 0.86 against Halmstad attack 0.70 / defence 1.27, drawn from 46/46 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gais 62% | Draw 23% | Halmstad 15%, with Gais to win its most likely call at 62%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 45%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 71% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 43% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gais 46%, Halmstad 50%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 45%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gais's trading profile (46 games, 22 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one.

Halmstad's trading profile (46 games, 22 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 41% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Gais arrived the stronger side — 1.65 PPG against 1.09. That form edge translated into the three points. Gais (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.41 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights