🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Degerfors IF at 46%, yet in-form Gais provide a compelling counter-argument — this Gais vs Degerfors IF fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Degerfors IF make the trip to Gamla Ullevi to face Gais in Allsvenskan, Regular Season - 3. The match kicks off on Sunday 13 April 2025 at 15:30 UTC.

Form

Gais (all games): 4W 4D 2L across 10 Allsvenskan fixtures this term — 1.60 PPG. Last five: L D D W W. They are averaging 1.20 goals per game and conceding 1.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Gais's home record at Gamla Ullevi: 5W 4D 1L from 10 Allsvenskan appearances (1.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 0.40 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Gamla Ullevi. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Degerfors IF have collected 0.60 PPG across 10 Allsvenskan outings this season: 1W 3D 6L. Last five: D L D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Degerfors IF haven't played a Allsvenskan game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

Degerfors IF's away record: 2W 3D 5L from 10 road trips in Allsvenskan this season (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The form ledger tips toward Gais. A 1.00 PPG lead over Degerfors IF (1.60 vs 0.60) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

Trading

Gais half-time and goal-timing data (30 games, 15 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 64% of the time; BTTS occurs in 40% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (home games); they fail to score in 40% of games.

Degerfors IF half-time and goal-timing data (30 games, 15 at away): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Gais 43% versus Degerfors IF 60%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Gais 50% | Degerfors IF 63%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Gais 1.13 xG and Degerfors IF 1.51 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Gais attack 0.871 / defence 0.909 | Degerfors IF attack 1.328 / defence 0.963. League average goals — home 1.350 / away 1.248. Degerfors IF have an above-average attack strength of 1.328 — the away xG of 1.51 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 32 Gais games / 2 Degerfors IF games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Gais 29% | Draw 26% | Degerfors IF 46%. Fair-value odds: Gais 3.45 | Draw 3.85 | Degerfors IF 2.17. Degerfors IF hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (26%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.64. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.64 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Degerfors IF at 46% — moderate model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Gais (1.60 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 26% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Degerfors IF if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.64 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 49% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.2 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 53% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Gais 30% | Degerfors IF 60%.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (2 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights