🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Djurgardens IF at 37% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Djurgardens IF vs Degerfors IF encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Djurgardens IF and Degerfors IF meet at 3Arena in Allsvenskan, Regular Season - 14. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 6 July 2025 at 15:30 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Djurgardens IF have collected 1.30 PPG across 10 Allsvenskan outings this season: 3W 4D 3L. Last five: L D W L D. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Djurgardens IF, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Djurgardens IF's home record at 3Arena: 3W 5D 2L from 10 Allsvenskan appearances (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Degerfors IF (all games): 2W 1D 7L across 10 Allsvenskan outings this term — 0.70 points per game. Last five: W L L L L. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 2.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.30 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Degerfors IF, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Allsvenskan this season, Degerfors IF have posted 5W 2D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 1.70 exceeds their overall 0.70 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

The points-per-game gap of 0.60 in Djurgardens IF's favour (1.30 vs 0.70) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

Head-to-Head

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 6 head-to-head meetings have produced 3 wins for Djurgardens IF, 3 for Degerfors IF and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.7 per game across 6 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 27 Aug 2023, ended 4–1 with Djurgardens IF winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.7 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Djurgardens IF half-time and goal-timing data (43 games, 21 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; BTTS occurs in 48% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 24% of games (home games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

Degerfors IF half-time and goal-timing data (43 games, 21 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Djurgardens IF 44% versus Degerfors IF 63%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Djurgardens IF 40% | Degerfors IF 51%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Djurgardens IF 1.31 xG and Degerfors IF 1.26 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Djurgardens IF attack 0.820 / defence 0.910 | Degerfors IF attack 1.113 / defence 1.218. League average goals — home 1.314 / away 1.249. Degerfors IF bring a strong defensive rating of 1.218 — this is suppressing Djurgardens IF's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 43 Djurgardens IF games / 13 Degerfors IF games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Djurgardens IF 37% | Draw 28% | Degerfors IF 35%. Fair-value odds: Djurgardens IF 2.70 | Draw 3.57 | Degerfors IF 2.86. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS probability 53% | Total xG 2.58. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.58 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 53% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Djurgardens IF are the pick at 37% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Djurgardens IF if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.58 combined xG gives a 48% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration — though H2H averaging only 3.7 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 53%. Form rates corroborate: Djurgardens IF 70% | Degerfors IF 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights