🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

BK Hacken and Malmo FF share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

BK Hacken and Malmo FF finished level at 1-1 at Bravida Arena, Regular Season - 29, in the Allsvenskan. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting BK Hacken 1.31 xG and Malmo FF 1.90 xG, a combined 3.21. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Malmo FF landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of BK Hacken attack 0.91 / defence 1.20 against Malmo FF attack 1.13 / defence 0.94, drawn from 58/58 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it BK Hacken 26% | Draw 23% | Malmo FF 51%, with Malmo FF to win its most likely call at 51%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 23% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 83% and landed. Over 3.5 was 40% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 63% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (BK Hacken 64%, Malmo FF 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

BK Hacken's trading profile (58 games, 29 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did.

Malmo FF's trading profile (58 games, 29 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 43% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Malmo FF arrived the stronger side — 1.90 PPG against 1.31. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. BK Hacken (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.83 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.83 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights