🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at AIK Stockholm's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Strawberry Arena, Regular Season - 10, as AIK Stockholm and Hammarby FF drew 0-0 in the Allsvenskan. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AIK Stockholm 1.46 xG and Hammarby FF 1.23 xG, a combined 2.69. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. AIK Stockholm fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Hammarby FF landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AIK Stockholm attack 1.25 / defence 0.81 against Hammarby FF attack 1.08 / defence 0.84, drawn from 39/39 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AIK Stockholm 42% | Draw 26% | Hammarby FF 32%, with AIK Stockholm to win its most likely call at 42%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 50%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 51% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AIK Stockholm 48%, Hammarby FF 53%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AIK Stockholm's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one.

Hammarby FF's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 45% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — AIK Stockholm 1.50 PPG, Hammarby FF 1.63 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. AIK Stockholm (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.67 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.97 average — tighter than their form line. Hammarby FF (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.07 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.03 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights