🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Athletic Club at 56% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Athletic Club vs Alaves encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A La Liga encounter, Regular Season - 35 sees Alaves travel to San Mamés Barria to take on Athletic Club. The game is scheduled for Sunday 11 May 2025, 17:30 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Athletic Club stand at 4W 4D 2L from 10 La Liga matches — 1.60 PPG. Last five: D W L W D. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 0.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Defensively, conceding just 0.50 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes.

Athletic Club at San Mamés Barria this season: 7W 3D 0L from 10 home games — 2.40 PPG on home soil. They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at San Mamés Barria. Their home PPG of 2.40 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.60 — Athletic Club are significantly better at San Mamés Barria than their overall form suggests.

Across all La Liga games this season, Alaves have recorded 3W 4D 3L from 10 outings — 1.30 PPG. Last five: W L D W D. Their scoring rate of 0.70 per game is modest, conceding 0.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.

On the road, Alaves have gone 2W 6D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.60 PPG (Athletic Club) versus 1.30 (Alaves). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

H2H Record

The fixture history tells a clear story: Athletic Club have dominated this rivalry, winning 3 of 5 past contests while Alaves have managed just 0 wins.

These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.4 per contest from 5 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 15 Dec 2024, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The historical record gives Athletic Club a meaningful edge here — 3 wins from 5 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

In-Play Data

Athletic Club trading profile (72 games, 36 at home): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 68% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time.

Alaves trading profile (72 games, 36 at away): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Athletic Club 47% versus Alaves 43%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Athletic Club 40% | Alaves 35%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Athletic Club 1.69 xG and Alaves 0.89 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Athletic Club attack 1.178 / defence 0.707 | Alaves attack 1.047 / defence 1.020. League average goals — home 1.406 / away 1.197. Athletic Club's defence rating of 0.707 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 72 Athletic Club games / 72 Alaves games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Athletic Club 56% | Draw 24% | Alaves 20%. Fair-value odds: Athletic Club 1.79 | Draw 4.17 | Alaves 5.00. The model has a clear lean to Athletic Club (56%) — a 36pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS probability 48% | Total xG 2.58. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.58 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 48% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, Athletic Club are the pick at 56% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 24% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.58 combined xG gives a 48% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by H2H averaging 1.4 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 48% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Athletic Club 40% | Alaves 80% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights