🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Ulsan Hyundai FC at 42%, yet in-form FC Anyang provide a compelling counter-argument — this Ulsan Hyundai FC vs FC Anyang fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a K League 1 clash, Regular Season - 30 as Ulsan Hyundai FC welcome FC Anyang to Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium. Kick-off is set for Sunday 21 September 2025 at 08:30 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all K League 1 games this season, Ulsan Hyundai FC have gone 1W 3D 6L from 10 outings — a 0.60 PPG return. Last five: W L L L D. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Ulsan Hyundai FC's home record at Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium: 3W 3D 4L from 10 K League 1 appearances (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.60 — Ulsan Hyundai FC are significantly better at Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, FC Anyang stand at 4W 0D 6L from 10 K League 1 matches — 1.20 PPG. Last five: L L W W W. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

On the road, FC Anyang have gone 3W 0D 7L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. FC Anyang are 0.60 PPG ahead (1.20 vs 0.60), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Ulsan Hyundai FC register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, FC Anyang in 70% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for Ulsan Hyundai FC, 1 for FC Anyang and 0 shared spoils from 2 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The last 2 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 23 Apr 2025, ended 1–0 with Ulsan Hyundai FC winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Data

Ulsan Hyundai FC trading profile (29 games, 14 at home): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 90% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

FC Anyang trading profile (29 games, 14 at away): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Ulsan Hyundai FC 55% versus FC Anyang 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ulsan Hyundai FC 41% | FC Anyang 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ulsan Hyundai FC 1.41 xG and FC Anyang 1.19 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ulsan Hyundai FC attack 0.924 / defence 1.071 | FC Anyang attack 0.843 / defence 1.045. League average goals — home 1.462 / away 1.313. Data: 62 Ulsan Hyundai FC games / 29 FC Anyang games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ulsan Hyundai FC 42% | Draw 26% | FC Anyang 32%. Fair-value odds: Ulsan Hyundai FC 2.38 | Draw 3.85 | FC Anyang 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS probability 52% | Total xG 2.60. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.60 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 52% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Ulsan Hyundai FC at 42% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form FC Anyang (1.20 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Ulsan Hyundai FC offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.60 combined xG gives a 48% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

Poisson assigns a 52% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Ulsan Hyundai FC 60% | FC Anyang 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights