🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Jeju United FC's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Jeju World Cup Stadium, Regular Season - 26, as Jeju United FC and Gangwon FC drew 0-0 in the K League 1. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Jeju United FC 1.25 xG and Gangwon FC 1.10 xG, a combined 2.35. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Jeju United FC fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Gangwon FC landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Jeju United FC attack 1.05 / defence 0.98 against Gangwon FC attack 0.89 / defence 0.91, drawn from 58/58 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Jeju United FC 40% | Draw 28% | Gangwon FC 32%, with Jeju United FC to win its most likely call at 40%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 28%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 42%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 68% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 48% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Jeju United FC 46%, Gangwon FC 54%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Jeju United FC's trading profile (63 games, 31 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 29% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gangwon FC's trading profile (63 games, 31 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Jeju United FC 1.24 PPG, Gangwon FC 1.51 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Jeju United FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.23 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.19 average — tighter than their form line. Gangwon FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.06 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.52 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights