Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

K League 1 · Regular Season - 3

Kick-off

Sun 2 Mar 2025

07:30

Venue

Chuncheon Songam Stadium

Competition

K League 1

South-Korea

Status

FT
📰

Stalemate at Gangwon FC's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Chuncheon Songam Stadium, Regular Season - 3, as Gangwon FC and Jeju United FC drew 0-0 in the K League 1. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gangwon FC 1.67 xG and Jeju United FC 1.09 xG, a combined 2.76. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gangwon FC fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Jeju United FC landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gangwon FC attack 1.17 / defence 1.00 against Jeju United FC attack 0.94 / defence 1.06, drawn from 35/35 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Gangwon FC 51% | Draw 24% | Jeju United FC 25%, with Gangwon FC to win its most likely call at 51%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 52%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 76% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 43% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gangwon FC 41%, Jeju United FC 46%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gangwon FC's trading profile (76 games, 38 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 28% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Jeju United FC's trading profile (76 games, 38 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 29% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gangwon FC 1.34 PPG, Jeju United FC 1.18 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Gangwon FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.61 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.18 average — tighter than their form line. Jeju United FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.03 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.55 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 52% Over 2.5 probability, but 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 54% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 43% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.