🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Gangwon FC's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Gangwon FC and Daejeon Citizen finished level at 0-0 at Chuncheon Songam Stadium, Regular Season - 31, in the K League 1. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Gangwon FC 1.50 xG and Daejeon Citizen 1.31 xG, a combined 2.81. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Gangwon FC fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Daejeon Citizen landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Gangwon FC attack 0.94 / defence 1.01 against Daejeon Citizen attack 1.04 / defence 1.10, drawn from 63/63 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Gangwon FC 42% | Draw 25% | Daejeon Citizen 33%, with Gangwon FC to win its most likely call at 42%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 53%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 77% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 57% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Gangwon FC 52%, Daejeon Citizen 48%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 54%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Gangwon FC's trading profile (68 games, 34 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 28% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Daejeon Citizen's trading profile (68 games, 34 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 28% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Gangwon FC 1.54 PPG, Daejeon Citizen 1.41 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Gangwon FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.68 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.21 average — tighter than their form line. Daejeon Citizen (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.38 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.53 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights