🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at FC Seoul's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Seoul World Cup Stadium, Regular Season - 3, as FC Seoul and Gimcheon Sangmu FC drew 0-0 in the K League 1. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting FC Seoul 1.62 xG and Gimcheon Sangmu FC 1.30 xG, a combined 2.92. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. FC Seoul fell 1.6 short of their projected output. Gimcheon Sangmu FC landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of FC Seoul attack 1.11 / defence 0.98 against Gimcheon Sangmu FC attack 1.20 / defence 1.14, drawn from 35/35 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it FC Seoul 45% | Draw 24% | Gimcheon Sangmu FC 31%, with FC Seoul to win its most likely call at 45%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 79% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (FC Seoul 45%, Gimcheon Sangmu FC 47%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 47%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

FC Seoul's trading profile (38 games, 18 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

Gimcheon Sangmu FC's trading profile (38 games, 18 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 42% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 45% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — FC Seoul 1.53 PPG, Gimcheon Sangmu FC 1.66 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. FC Seoul (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.61 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.06 average — tighter than their form line. Gimcheon Sangmu FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.28 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.33 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights