🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates FC Anyang at 42%, yet other data sources diverge — this FC Anyang vs Jeju United FC fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a K League 1 clash, Regular Season - 29 as FC Anyang welcome Jeju United FC to Anyang Stadium. Kick-off is set for Sunday 14 September 2025 at 11:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all K League 1 games this season, FC Anyang have gone 4W 0D 6L from 10 outings — a 1.20 PPG return. Last five: L L L W W. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

In front of their own supporters this season, FC Anyang have posted 3W 3D 4L at Anyang Stadium — 1.20 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Jeju United FC stand at 2W 3D 5L from 10 K League 1 matches — 0.90 PPG. Last five: L L D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.30 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Jeju United FC's away record: 2W 3D 5L from 10 road trips in K League 1 this season (0.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: FC Anyang 1.20 PPG, Jeju United FC 0.90 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. FC Anyang register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, Jeju United FC in 80% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for FC Anyang, 1 for Jeju United FC and 0 shared spoils from 2 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 19 Jul 2025, ended 0–2 with Jeju United FC winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Patterns

FC Anyang in-play and half-time data (28 games, 14 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

Jeju United FC in-play and half-time data (28 games, 14 at away): they score before half-time in 43% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 79% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 43% of games (away games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — FC Anyang 61% versus Jeju United FC 50%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (FC Anyang 57% | Jeju United FC 43%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects FC Anyang 1.45 xG and Jeju United FC 1.23 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: FC Anyang attack 0.974 / defence 1.108 | Jeju United FC attack 0.894 / defence 1.025. League average goals — home 1.455 / away 1.237. Data: 28 FC Anyang games / 61 Jeju United FC games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: FC Anyang 42% | Draw 26% | Jeju United FC 32%. Fair-value odds: FC Anyang 2.38 | Draw 3.85 | Jeju United FC 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 50% | BTTS probability 54% | Total xG 2.68. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 50%/50% — the total xG of 2.68 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 54% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is FC Anyang at 42% — marginal model lean. With a 26% draw probability, Draw No Bet on FC Anyang offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.68 combined xG gives a 50% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 54% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: FC Anyang 60% | Jeju United FC 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights