🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at FC Anyang's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Anyang Stadium, Regular Season - 31, as FC Anyang and Gwangju FC drew 0-0 in the K League 1. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting FC Anyang 1.38 xG and Gwangju FC 1.30 xG, a combined 2.68. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. FC Anyang fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Gwangju FC landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of FC Anyang attack 1.01 / defence 1.11 against Gwangju FC attack 0.97 / defence 0.95, drawn from 30/63 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it FC Anyang 39% | Draw 26% | Gwangju FC 35%, with FC Anyang to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 50%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (FC Anyang 57%, Gwangju FC 43%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

FC Anyang's trading profile (30 games, 15 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Gwangju FC's trading profile (30 games, 15 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — FC Anyang 1.23 PPG, Gwangju FC 1.37 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. FC Anyang (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.47 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.27 average — tighter than their form line. Gwangju FC (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.07 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.20 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights