🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as NEOM edge out Al Riyadh 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

NEOM beat Al Riyadh 1-0 at King Khalid Sports City, Regular Season - 21, in the Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting NEOM 1.59 xG and Al Riyadh 1.36 xG, a combined 2.94. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Al Riyadh landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of NEOM attack 0.81 / defence 1.20 against Al Riyadh attack 0.82 / defence 1.33, drawn from 19/53 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it NEOM 42% | Draw 25% | Al Riyadh 32%, with NEOM to win its most likely call at 42%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 80% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (NEOM 63%, Al Riyadh 53%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 71%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

NEOM's trading profile (19 games, 9 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 68% of their matches — today it did not.

Al Riyadh's trading profile (19 games, 9 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 74% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, NEOM arrived the stronger side — 1.32 PPG against 0.63. Form held, and they took the win. NEOM (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.89 average — tighter than their form line. Al Riyadh (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.89 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.67 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights