🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Al Taawon's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Al Taawon and Al Orubah finished level at 0-0 at Al Taawoun Club Stadium, Regular Season - 17, in the Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Al Taawon 2.10 xG and Al Orubah 0.89 xG, a combined 2.99. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Al Taawon fell 2.1 short of their projected output. Al Orubah landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Al Taawon attack 0.97 / defence 0.89 against Al Orubah attack 0.70 / defence 1.50, drawn from 50/16 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Al Taawon 65% | Draw 20% | Al Orubah 15%, with Al Taawon to win its most likely call at 65%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 20% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 57%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 80% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 52% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Al Taawon 25%, Al Orubah 56%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 31%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Al Taawon's trading profile (16 games, 8 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 38% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 25% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Al Orubah's trading profile (16 games, 8 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 25% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 56% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Al Taawon arrived the stronger side — 1.38 PPG against 0.81. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Al Taawon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.38 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.88 average — tighter than their form line. Al Orubah (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.12 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.50 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights