🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Al-Qadisiyah FC at 53%, yet other data sources diverge — this Al-Qadisiyah FC vs Al Kholood fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Al-Qadisiyah FC and Al Kholood meet at Prince Saud bin Jalawi Stadium in Pro League, Regular Season - 8. This fixture gets under way on Thursday 6 November 2025 at 17:30 UTC.

Current Form

Al-Qadisiyah FC's overall Pro League record this term: 6W 2D 2L from 10 games (2.00 PPG). Last five: W W W D L. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.10 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Al-Qadisiyah FC have played only a handful of Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

In front of their own supporters this season, Al-Qadisiyah FC have posted 7W 3D 0L at Prince Saud bin Jalawi Stadium — 2.40 PPG. They are averaging 2.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Al Kholood (all games): 5W 0D 5L across 10 Pro League outings this term — 1.50 points per game. Last five: W W W L L. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 1.60. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. Al Kholood have played only a handful of Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Al Kholood's away record: 2W 0D 8L from 10 road trips in Pro League this season (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 2.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.60 is notably below their overall 1.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Form favours the hosts. Al-Qadisiyah FC's 2.00 PPG return is 0.50 points per game ahead of Al Kholood's 1.50 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — Al-Qadisiyah FC register both teams scoring in 80% of relevant games, Al Kholood in 70%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 2 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Al-Qadisiyah FC, 0 for Al Kholood and 0 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 4.0 goals per game across 2 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 2 May 2025, ended 4–1 with Al-Qadisiyah FC winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Al-Qadisiyah FC half-time and goal-timing data (41 games, 20 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; they lead at the break 46% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).

Al Kholood half-time and goal-timing data (41 games, 20 at away): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 55% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al-Qadisiyah FC 49% versus Al Kholood 61%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Qadisiyah FC 49% | Al Kholood 58%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Qadisiyah FC 1.55 xG and Al Kholood 0.88 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Qadisiyah FC attack 0.998 / defence 0.770 | Al Kholood attack 0.764 / defence 1.038. League average goals — home 1.498 / away 1.495. Al-Qadisiyah FC's defence rating of 0.770 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 41 Al-Qadisiyah FC games / 41 Al Kholood games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Qadisiyah FC 53% | Draw 27% | Al Kholood 21%. Fair-value odds: Al-Qadisiyah FC 1.89 | Draw 3.70 | Al Kholood 4.76. Al-Qadisiyah FC hold a narrow Poisson edge at 53% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 44% | BTTS probability 47% | Total xG 2.43. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 56% — total xG of 2.43 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 47% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Al-Qadisiyah FC at 53% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Al-Qadisiyah FC if the outright odds are short.

Poisson projects 2.43 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 44% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction — though form averaging only 3.1 goals per game points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 47% on No. This conflicts with form data: Al-Qadisiyah FC 80% | Al Kholood 70% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights