🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Al-Raed at 38%, yet in-form Al Orubah provide a compelling counter-argument — this Al Orubah vs Al-Raed fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Al-Jouf University Stadium plays host to Al Orubah versus Al-Raed in Pro League, Regular Season - 28. Kick-off: Saturday 19 April 2025 at 17:25 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Al Orubah have collected 1.20 PPG across 10 Pro League outings this season: 4W 0D 6L. Last five: W L L L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.80 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Al Orubah, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Al Orubah have posted 3W 0D 7L at Al-Jouf University Stadium — 0.90 PPG. At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Al-Raed (all games): 1W 1D 8L across 10 Pro League outings this term — 0.40 points per game. Last five: D L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 2.00 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.00 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Al-Raed, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Raed's form when playing away from home: 2W 0D 8L across 10 road games this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The points-per-game gap of 0.80 in Al Orubah's favour (1.20 vs 0.40) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: Al Orubah 0W, Al-Raed 1W, 0D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.0 per game across 1 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 23 Nov 2024, ended 1–3 with Al-Raed winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

Al Orubah goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (27 games, 13 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 23% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (home games); they fail to score in 56% of games.

Al-Raed goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (27 games, 13 at away): they score before half-time in 92% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 69% of games (away games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al Orubah 30% versus Al-Raed 59%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al Orubah 52% | Al-Raed 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al Orubah 1.45 xG and Al-Raed 1.50 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al Orubah attack 0.756 / defence 1.204 | Al-Raed attack 0.964 / defence 1.318. League average goals — home 1.457 / away 1.291. Al Orubah's attack strength of 0.756 is below the league average — the 1.45 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Al-Raed bring a strong defensive rating of 1.318 — this is suppressing Al Orubah's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 27 Al Orubah games / 61 Al-Raed games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al Orubah 36% | Draw 26% | Al-Raed 38%. Fair-value odds: Al Orubah 2.78 | Draw 3.85 | Al-Raed 2.63. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 57% | BTTS probability 60% | Total xG 2.95. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 57% — the 2.95 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% reflects that both xG figures (1.45 / 1.50) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Al-Raed at 38% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Al Orubah (1.20 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 26% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Al-Raed if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.95 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 57% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 60% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Al Orubah 30% | Al-Raed 60%.

The outsider holds a 36% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights