🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Al-Nassr at 60%, yet other data sources diverge — this Al-Nassr vs Al-Qadisiyah FC fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Al-Qadisiyah FC make the trip to King Saud University Stadium to face Al-Nassr in Pro League, Regular Season - 14. The match kicks off on Thursday 8 January 2026 at 17:30 UTC.

Form

Al-Nassr (all games): 8W 1D 1L across 10 Pro League fixtures this term — 2.50 PPG. Last five: W W W D L. They are averaging 3.00 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Al-Nassr, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Al-Nassr's form when playing at home: 8W 1D 1L across 10 games at King Saud University Stadium this term (2.50 PPG). They are averaging 2.80 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Al-Qadisiyah FC's overall Pro League record this term: 6W 2D 2L from 10 games (2.00 PPG). Last five: W L D W W. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 0.90. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for Al-Qadisiyah FC, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Al-Qadisiyah FC have gone 4W 2D 4L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.40 PPG). Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.40 is notably below their overall 2.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The points-per-game gap of 0.50 in Al-Nassr's favour (2.50 vs 2.00) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Al-Nassr have seen both teams score in 70% of their games, Al-Qadisiyah FC in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 2 meetings: Al-Nassr 0W, Al-Qadisiyah FC 2W, 0D.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 2 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 18 Apr 2025, ended 1–2 with Al-Qadisiyah FC winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Al-Nassr — key trading statistics (46 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; they lead at the break 54% of the time; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 46%.

Al-Qadisiyah FC — key trading statistics (46 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; they lead at the break 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 52% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al-Nassr 70% versus Al-Qadisiyah FC 50%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Nassr 72% | Al-Qadisiyah FC 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Nassr 2.27 xG and Al-Qadisiyah FC 1.24 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Nassr attack 1.531 / defence 0.779 | Al-Qadisiyah FC attack 1.096 / defence 1.000. League average goals — home 1.480 / away 1.449. Al-Nassr carry an above-average attack strength of 1.531 — their λ of 2.27 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Al-Nassr's defence rating of 0.779 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 46 Al-Nassr games / 46 Al-Qadisiyah FC games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Nassr 60% | Draw 20% | Al-Qadisiyah FC 20%. Fair-value odds: Al-Nassr 1.67 | Draw 5.00 | Al-Qadisiyah FC 5.00. The model has a clear lean to Al-Nassr (60%) — a 40pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 68% | BTTS probability 64% | Total xG 3.50. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 68% — a total xG of 3.50 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 64% reflects that both xG figures (2.27 / 1.24) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Al-Nassr are the pick at 60% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 20% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.50 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 68% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 64% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Al-Nassr 70% | Al-Qadisiyah FC 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights