Sign in Register

Rubin 1-0 Fakel – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 13

Kick-off

Sat 31 Oct 2026

12:15

Venue

Ak Bars Arena

Competition

Premier League

Russia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Rubin at 36% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Rubin vs Fakel encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Rubin and Fakel meet at Ak Bars Arena in Premier League, Regular Season - 13. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 31 October 2026 at 12:15 UTC.

Current Form

Rubin's overall Premier League record this term: 1W 6D 3L from 10 games (0.90 PPG). Last five: D D L L L. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Rubin, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Rubin's home record at Ak Bars Arena: 1W 6D 3L from 10 Premier League appearances (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Fakel have collected 0.60 PPG across 10 Premier League outings this season: 1W 3D 6L. Last five: D L L W L. Their scoring rate of 0.50 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Fakel, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Fakel have gone 1W 0D 4L from 5 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 0.90 for Rubin, 0.60 for Fakel — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Rubin have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Fakel in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Historically, Rubin have had the better of this match-up — 3 wins from 4 meetings, with Fakel managing just 0 victories and 1 draws shared.

Historically, goals have been at a premium in this fixture — just 1.2 per game from 4 meetings. The Under 2.5 has a clear base rate from the H2H record alone. The most recent clash, on 27 Apr 2025, ended 2–1 with Rubin winning.

The historical record gives Rubin a meaningful edge here — 3 wins from 4 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading & In-Play

Rubin — key trading statistics (12 games, 5 at home): they score before half-time in 40% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 20% of games (home games).

Fakel — key trading statistics (12 games, 5 at away): they score before half-time in 40% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games); they fail to score in 58% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Rubin 75% versus Fakel 42%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Rubin 33% | Fakel 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Rubin 1.26 xG and Fakel 1.15 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Rubin attack 0.794 / defence 1.049 | Fakel attack 0.876 / defence 1.131. League average goals — home 1.403 / away 1.246. Rubin's attack strength of 0.794 is below the league average — the 1.26 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 42 Rubin games / 12 Fakel games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Rubin 36% | Draw 33% | Fakel 31%. Fair-value odds: Rubin 2.78 | Draw 3.03 | Fakel 3.23. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 33% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 43% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.41. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 57% — total xG of 2.41 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Rubin as the most likely outcome at 36% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 33% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Rubin if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.41 combined xG gives a 43% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by H2H averaging 1.2 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 51%. Form rates corroborate: Rubin 60% | Fakel 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Rubin hold a strong historical advantage, winning 3 of 4 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Rubin — H2H win rate 75% vs Poisson 36%.
Form Rubin Poisson xG (1.26) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.90) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Rubin 6/10, Fakel 3/5) and Poisson model (51%).
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 33% — tight contest expected.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Rubin vs Fakel | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 13 | Venue: Ak Bars Arena • Kick-off: Saturday 31 Oct 2026, 12:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Rubin 36% | Draw 33% | Fakel 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 43% | BTTS 51% | xG Rubin 1.26 / Fakel 1.15 • Poisson strength factors: Rubin attack 0.794 / def 1.049 | Fakel attack 0.876 / def 1.131 | league avg home 1.403 / away 1.246 • Poisson stance: Rubin (36%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.26

Rubin xG

Expected Goals

1.15

Fakel xG

36%
33%
31%
Rubin Draw Fakel

51%

BTTS

72%

Over 1.5

43%

Over 2.5

22%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Rubin vs Fakel kick off?

Rubin vs Fakel kicked off at 12:15 on Saturday 31 October 2026 at Ak Bars Arena.

What was the final score in Rubin vs Fakel?

Rubin 1 - 0 Fakel.

Where is Rubin vs Fakel being played?

The match is being played at Ak Bars Arena.

What competition is Rubin vs Fakel part of?

Rubin vs Fakel is a Regular Season - 13 fixture in the Premier League (Russia).

Who is favourite to win Rubin vs Fakel?

Our statistical model gives Rubin a 36% chance of winning, Fakel a 31% chance, and a 33% chance of a draw — making Rubin the favourite.

Will both teams score in Rubin vs Fakel?

Our model estimates a 51% probability that both Rubin and Fakel will score (BTTS).

Will Rubin vs Fakel have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 43%.

What is the head-to-head record between Rubin and Fakel?

Record (4 meetings): Rubin 3W | Draws 1 | Fakel 0W.

What form are Rubin and Fakel in?

Rubin (all comps): 1W-6D-3L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.40 | L5 D-D-L-L-L. Fakel (all comps): 1W-3D-6L in 10 | 0.60 PPG | GF 0.50 / GA 1.50 | L5 D-L-L-W-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

The model rates Rubin's attack at 0.79x the league average against Fakel's defence at 1.13x — combine the two and it projects 1.26 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Fakel's attack (0.88x) against Rubin's defence (1.05x) — and the away total comes out at 1.15.

These ratings are built from 42/12 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 14.7% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-0 (10.7%), 1-0 (9.7%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 35% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Rubin Win

36%

Rubin

2.75

33%

Draw

3.05

31%

Fakel

3.25

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

13.0%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

11.4%

Home win

0 – 1

10.3%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.26

Rubin xG

Total xG

2.41

1.15

Fakel xG

36%
33%
31%
RubinDrawFakel

2.75

36%

Home win

3.05

33%

Draw

3.25

31%

Away win

Goals Markets

69%

Over 1.5

1.45

31%

Under 1.5

3.23

43%

Over 2.5

2.33

57%

Under 2.5

1.75

22%

Over 3.5

4.55

78%

Under 3.5

1.28

10%

Over 4.5

10.00

90%

Under 4.5

1.11

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

51%

BTTS Yes

1.94

49%

BTTS No

2.06

Clean Sheet

32%

Rubin

3.14

28%

Fakel

3.53

Win to Nil

12%

Rubin

8.63

9%

Fakel

11.46

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 9.0 10.3 5.9 2.3 0.6 0.1
1 11.4 13.0 7.5 2.8 0.8 0.2
2 7.2 8.2 4.7 1.8 0.5 0.1
3 3.0 3.5 2.0 0.8 0.2 –
4 1.0 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 –
5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 – –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.261
λ Away (xG) 1.145
Total xG 2.406
League avg home goals 1.403
League avg away goals 1.246
Rubin attack strength 0.794
Rubin defence strength 1.049
Fakel attack strength 0.876
Fakel defence strength 1.131
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 42 / 12

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Rubin vs Fakel?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.7%.

How many goals are Rubin and Fakel expected to score?

The model projects 1.26 expected goals for Rubin and 1.15 for Fakel, a combined total of 2.41.

How confident is the prediction model for Rubin vs Fakel?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 36%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 12 outings, Rubin have picked up 1.00 PPG on a 2W 6D 4L record — D-D-L-L-L across the most recent five. The sample for Rubin is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Fakel's form line: 1W 3D 8L from 12 games, 0.50 PPG, last five D-L-L-W-L. The sample for Fakel is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Rubin are the form team by 0.50 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Fakel.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Rubin have posted 1.00 PPG from 5 outings (1W 2D 2L).

On the road, Fakel have gone 1W 0D 4L from 5 away games — 0.60 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Rubin come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Rubin are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game recently; Fakel are on 0.67 scored and 1.67 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Rubin have seen both teams score in 75% of their recent games.

Last 12 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Rubin

Rubin

Blended
D D L L L
Fakel

Fakel

Blended
D L L W L
12 Played 12
2/6/4 W / D / L 1/3/8
1.00 Points Per Game 0.50
1.00 Avg Goals Scored 0.67
1.50 Avg Goals Conceded 1.67
2.50 Avg Goals / Game 2.33
0 Clean Sheets 2
9 BTTS 5
4 Over 2.5 Games 6
Rubin

Rubin

L
H Krylia Sovetov
0–2 HT 0–0
24 Oct
L
A Spartak Moscow
0–4 HT 0–2
18 Oct
L
H Dynamo
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Oct
D
A Rodina Moskva
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Sep
D
A CSKA Moscow
1–1 HT 0–1
12 Sep
D
H Akhmat
1–1 HT 1–0
07 Sep
W
H Dinamo Makhachkala
3–1 HT 0–0
30 Aug
D
A Baltika
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Aug
D
A FC Rostov
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Aug
D
H FC Orenburg
1–1 HT 0–0
09 Aug
W
A Akron
2–1 HT 2–1
01 Aug
L
H FC Krasnodar
1–3 HT 1–1
26 Jul
Fakel

Fakel

L
H Rodina Moskva
0–1 HT 0–1
24 Oct
W
A Krylia Sovetov
2–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
L
H Lokomotiv
0–5 HT 0–2
10 Oct
L
A Spartak Moscow
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Sep
D
H Baltika
2–2 HT 1–0
12 Sep
L
A FC Rostov
1–3 HT 0–0
05 Sep
L
H Zenit
0–1 HT 0–0
29 Aug
D
H FC Orenburg
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Aug
L
A CSKA Moscow
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Aug
D
H Akhmat
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
L
A FC Krasnodar
2–3 HT 0–2
02 Aug
L
H Dinamo Makhachkala
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Jul

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Rubin and Fakel in coming into this match?

Rubin have gone 2W 6D 4L in their last 12 games (1.00 PPG), while Fakel have gone 1W 3D 8L in their last 12 (0.50 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Rubin at home or Fakel away?

Rubin's home record (1.00 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Rubin at home: 1.00 PPG; Fakel away: 0.60 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 5 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2023 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 3 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. The two were last together as recently as 31 October 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

Rubin have won the last 2 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Rubin have gone 3W 0D 0L from 3 meetings on their own ground against Fakel — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 5 Meetings

Rubin

4

Rubin

1

Draws

Fakel

0

Fakel

Recent Meetings

Rubin
1–0
31 Oct 26
Fakel
Rubin
2–1
27 Apr 25
Fakel
Fakel
0–0
27 Sep 24
Rubin
Rubin
1–0
26 Nov 23
Fakel
Fakel
0–1
25 Sep 23
Rubin

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Rubin and Fakel?

From 5 meetings on record, Rubin have won 4, Fakel have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Rubin and Fakel last play each other?

They last met on 31 October 2026, when Rubin 1-0 Fakel.

Who has won more matches between Rubin and Fakel?

Rubin have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 5 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Rubin see a goal before the break in 40% of their matches.

Fakel see a goal before the break in 40% of their matches.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Rubin 60%, Fakel 60% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 20% (Rubin) and 60% (Fakel).

On the defensive side: Rubin have failed to score in 40% of games; Fakel in 40%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Rubin home games / Fakel away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Rubin Rubin Blended
Metric All
(12 games)
Venue
(5 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 8/12
(66.7%)
2/5
(40%)
2+ Goals Before HT 3/12
(25%)
0/5
(0%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 4/4
(100%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/4
(100%)
3/3
(100%)
Winning at HT 3/12
(25%)
1/5
(20%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/12
(16.7%)
1/5
(20%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/12
(16.7%)
0/5
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 9/12
(75%)
3/5
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 4/12
(33.3%)
1/5
(20%)
Over 3.5 Goals 3/12
(25%)
1/5
(20%)
Clean Sheet 0/12
(0%)
0/5
(0%)
Failed to Score 3/12
(25%)
2/5
(40%)
Fakel Fakel Blended
Metric All
(12 games)
Venue
(5 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 6/12
(50%)
2/5
(40%)
2+ Goals Before HT 4/12
(33.3%)
2/5
(40%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 4/6
(66.7%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/6
(16.7%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 1/12
(8.3%)
0/5
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/12
(8.3%)
0/5
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/12
(0%)
0/5
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 5/12
(41.7%)
3/5
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 6/12
(50%)
3/5
(60%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/12
(33.3%)
2/5
(40%)
Clean Sheet 2/12
(16.7%)
0/5
(0%)
Failed to Score 7/12
(58.3%)
2/5
(40%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Rubin play Fakel?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 60% of Rubin's games and 60% of Fakel's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Rubin vs Fakel usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 20% of Rubin's recent games and 60% of Fakel's, pointing to a tighter contest.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Rubin edge out Fakel 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Rubin beat Fakel 1-0 at Ak Bars Arena, Regular Season - 13, in the Premier League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Rubin 1.26 xG and Fakel 1.15 xG, a combined 2.41. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Fakel landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Rubin attack 0.79 / defence 1.05 against Fakel attack 0.88 / defence 1.13, drawn from 42/12 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Rubin 36% | Draw 33% | Fakel 31%, with Rubin to win its most likely call at 36%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 43%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 72% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 42% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Rubin 33%, Fakel 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Rubin's trading profile (12 games, 5 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 75% of their matches — today it did not.

Fakel's trading profile (12 games, 5 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 42% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 58% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Rubin arrived the stronger side — 1.00 PPG against 0.50. Form held, and they took the win. Rubin (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.20 average — tighter than their form line. Fakel (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.80 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 43% Over 2.5 probability, 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 51% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 42% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.