Khimki 1-0 Fakel – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates Khimki at 37%, yet other data sources diverge — this Khimki vs Fakel fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Analysis & Preview
A Premier League encounter, Regular Season - 19 sees Fakel travel to Arena Khimki to take on Khimki. The game is scheduled for Sunday 2 March 2025, 11:00 UTC.
Recent Form
Across all Premier League games this season, Khimki have gone 2W 4D 4L from 10 outings — a 1.00 PPG return. Last five: D L D W L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Khimki, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Khimki at Arena Khimki this season: 1W 4D 3L from 8 home games — 0.88 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.25 goals scored and 1.62 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 62% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.
Fakel — All Games: 1W 6D 3L from 10 Premier League fixtures this season — 0.90 PPG. Last five: D L D D L. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 1.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Fakel, so this record blends games from this season and last.
When travelling in Premier League this season, Fakel have posted 1W 2D 7L from 10 away outings — 0.50 PPG. Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game.
The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: Khimki 1.00 PPG, Fakel 0.90 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.
H2H Record
There is little to separate the sides historically. From 3 previous meetings, Khimki have won 0, Fakel 0, with 3 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.
These sides have historically produced few goals — 1.3 per contest from 3 previous meetings. The Under 2.5 market has a well-supported historical case here. The most recent clash, on 3 Nov 2024, ended 1–1 with a draw.
With a balanced win record and just 1.3 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.
In-Play Profile
Khimki in-play tendencies (18 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 38% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 50%; they fail to score in 33% of games.
Fakel in-play tendencies (18 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 38% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); they fail to score in 50% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Khimki 61% versus Fakel 44%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Khimki 56% | Fakel 33%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Khimki 1.43 xG and Fakel 1.27 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Khimki attack 0.959 / defence 1.197 | Fakel attack 0.865 / defence 1.087. League average goals — home 1.370 / away 1.230. Data: 18 Khimki games / 48 Fakel games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Khimki 37% | Draw 33% | Fakel 30%. Fair-value odds: Khimki 2.70 | Draw 3.03 | Fakel 3.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 33% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 2.70. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.70 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Analysis Verdict
On the Poisson output, Khimki are the pick at 37% — marginal model lean. With a 33% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Khimki offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
The Poisson model projects 2.70 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 51% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.3 goals per meeting points in the other direction.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 58% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Khimki 62% | Fakel 50% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Khimki vs Fakel | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 19 | Venue: Arena Khimki • Kick-off: Sunday 2 Mar 2025, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Khimki 37% | Draw 33% | Fakel 30% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 51% | BTTS 58% | xG Khimki 1.43 / Fakel 1.27 • Poisson strength factors: Khimki attack 0.959 / def 1.197 | Fakel attack 0.865 / def 1.087 | league avg home 1.370 / away 1.230 • Poisson stance: Khimki (37%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.43
Khimki xG
Expected Goals
1.27
Fakel xG
58%
BTTS
79%
Over 1.5
51%
Over 2.5
29%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Khimki vs Fakel kick off?
Khimki vs Fakel kicked off at 11:00 on Sunday 2 March 2025 at Arena Khimki.
What was the final score in Khimki vs Fakel?
Khimki 1 - 0 Fakel.
Where is Khimki vs Fakel being played?
The match is being played at Arena Khimki.
What competition is Khimki vs Fakel part of?
Khimki vs Fakel is a Regular Season - 19 fixture in the Premier League (Russia).
Who is favourite to win Khimki vs Fakel?
Our statistical model gives Khimki a 37% chance of winning, Fakel a 30% chance, and a 33% chance of a draw — making Khimki the favourite.
Will both teams score in Khimki vs Fakel?
Our model estimates a 58% probability that both Khimki and Fakel will score (BTTS).
Will Khimki vs Fakel have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 51%.
What is the head-to-head record between Khimki and Fakel?
Record (3 meetings): Khimki 0W | Draws 3 | Fakel 0W.
What form are Khimki and Fakel in?
Khimki (all comps): 2W-4D-4L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.90 | L5 D-L-D-W-L. Fakel (all comps): 1W-6D-3L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 1.10 | L5 D-L-D-D-L.
🧮 Model Insight
How the Model Works This Match
The model rates Khimki's attack at 0.96x the league average against Fakel's defence at 1.09x — combine the two and it projects 1.43 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Fakel's attack versus Khimki's defence, projects 1.27 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from 18/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 13.8% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (8.7%), 0-0 (8.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
Khimki Win
37%
2.70
33%
3.03
30%
3.34
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
12.2%
Draw
Most likely
1 – 0
9.6%
Home win
2 – 1
8.7%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.43
Khimki xG
Total xG
2.70
1.27
Fakel xG
2.70
37%
Home win
3.03
33%
Draw
3.34
30%
Away win
Goals Markets
75%
Over 1.5
1.33
25%
Under 1.5
4.00
51%
Over 2.5
1.96
49%
Under 2.5
2.04
29%
Over 3.5
3.45
71%
Under 3.5
1.41
14%
Over 4.5
7.14
86%
Under 4.5
1.16
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
58%
BTTS Yes
1.71
42%
BTTS No
2.40
Clean Sheet
28%
3.57
24%
4.17
Win to Nil
10%
9.65
7%
13.92
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.7 | 8.6 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 1 | 9.6 | 12.2 | 7.8 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| 2 | 6.8 | 8.7 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Khimki vs Fakel?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.8%.
How many goals are Khimki and Fakel expected to score?
The model projects 1.43 expected goals for Khimki and 1.27 for Fakel, a combined total of 2.70.
How confident is the prediction model for Khimki vs Fakel?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 37%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Form at a Glance
Khimki's recent record stands at 3W 7D 8L from 18 games, a 0.89 PPG return, with D-L-D-W-L in the last five. The sample for Khimki is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Fakel, meanwhile, have gone 2W 8D 8L across 18 games — 0.78 PPG, with D-L-D-D-L in their last five. The sample for Fakel is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Form-wise this is close to level: Khimki on 0.89 PPG, Fakel on 0.78. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.
Venue Form
At home specifically, Khimki have managed 1W 4D 3L from 8 games — 0.88 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Fakel's away record stands at 1W 2D 5L across 8 trips, a 0.62 PPG haul.
Goals in Recent Form
Khimki are averaging 1.22 goals scored and 1.94 conceded per game recently; Fakel are on 0.61 scored and 1.39 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: Khimki have seen both teams score in 61% of their recent games.
Last 18 Results — Premier League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Khimki
Blended
Fakel
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Khimki and Fakel in coming into this match?
Khimki have gone 3W 7D 8L in their last 18 games (0.89 PPG), while Fakel have gone 2W 8D 8L in their last 18 (0.78 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Khimki at home or Fakel away?
Khimki's home record (0.88 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Khimki at home: 0.88 PPG; Fakel away: 0.62 PPG.
Have Khimki or Fakel been keeping clean sheets recently?
Khimki have kept a clean sheet in 17% of their recent games, Fakel in 33%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
Fixture History
4 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 2 March 2025, some 2 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Streaks & Records
Khimki's record when hosting Fakel specifically: 1W 1D 0L from 2 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.
Last 4 Meetings
1
Khimki
3
Draws
0
Fakel
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Khimki and Fakel?
From 4 meetings on record, Khimki have won 1, Fakel have won 0, and 3 have been drawn.
When did Khimki and Fakel last play each other?
They last met on 2 March 2025, when Khimki 1-0 Fakel.
Who has won more matches between Khimki and Fakel?
Khimki have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 4 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
First-Half Patterns
Khimki see a goal before the break in 38% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.
Fakel are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 62% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.
Full-Time Trends
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Khimki 62%, Fakel 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 38% (Khimki) and 62% (Fakel).
On the defensive side: Fakel in 50%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Khimki home games / Fakel away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Khimki play Fakel?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 62% of Khimki's games and 50% of Fakel's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Khimki vs Fakel usually a high-scoring fixture?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 38% of Khimki's recent games and 62% of Fakel's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do Khimki and Fakel tend to score early?
Khimki have had a goal before half-time in 38% of their recent matches, Fakel in 62% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Prediction vindicated as Khimki edge out Fakel 1-0.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Khimki beat Fakel 1-0 at Arena Khimki, Regular Season - 19, in the Premier League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Khimki 1.43 xG and Fakel 1.27 xG, a combined 2.70. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Fakel landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Khimki attack 0.96 / defence 1.20 against Fakel attack 0.86 / defence 1.09, drawn from 18/48 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Khimki 37% | Draw 33% | Fakel 30%, with Khimki to win its most likely call at 37%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 79% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 44% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Khimki 56%, Fakel 33%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 53%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Khimki's trading profile (18 games, 8 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did not.
Fakel's trading profile (18 games, 8 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 50% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Khimki 0.89 PPG, Fakel 0.78 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Khimki win broke the near-deadlock. Khimki (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.62 average — tighter than their form line. Fakel (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 2.00 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.