Sign in Register

Fakel 0-0 Akhmat – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 23

Kick-off

Sat 5 Apr 2025

13:15

Venue

Stadion Fakel

Competition

Premier League

Russia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 37% as Fakel take on Akhmat.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Akhmat make the trip to Stadion Fakel to face Fakel in Premier League, Regular Season - 23. The match kicks off on Saturday 5 April 2025 at 13:15 UTC.

Current Form

Fakel's overall Premier League record this term: 0W 4D 6L from 10 games (0.40 PPG). Last five: L L L L L. They are averaging 0.30 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. This season is still relatively young for Fakel, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Fakel's form when playing at home: 1W 6D 3L across 10 games at Stadion Fakel this term (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.40 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 0.90 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.40 — Fakel are significantly better at Stadion Fakel than their overall form suggests.

Akhmat (all games): 3W 4D 3L across 10 Premier League outings this term — 1.30 points per game. Last five: W W D D D. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Akhmat, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Akhmat's form when playing away from home: 1W 4D 5L across 10 road games this term (0.70 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 0.70 is notably below their overall 1.30 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Akhmat arrive in superior form — a 0.90 PPG advantage (1.30 vs 0.40) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

Head-to-Head

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 5 head-to-head meetings have produced 3 wins for Fakel, 1 for Akhmat and 1 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.0 goals per game across 5 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 18 Oct 2024, ended 3–2 with Fakel winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading & In-Play

Fakel — key trading statistics (52 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 44% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 48% of the time; BTTS occurs in 28% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 4% of games (home games); they fail to score in 54% of games.

Akhmat — key trading statistics (52 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 62% of the time; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 40% of games (away games); they fail to score in 35% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Fakel 35% versus Akhmat 52%; no strong lean in either direction. Under 2.5 goals has backing from the in-play data — both teams register low Over 2.5 rates (Fakel 27% | Akhmat 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Fakel 1.02 xG and Akhmat 1.03 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Fakel attack 0.697 / defence 0.996 | Akhmat attack 0.962 / defence 0.969. League average goals — home 1.517 / away 1.074. Fakel's attack strength of 0.697 is below the league average — the 1.02 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 52 Fakel games / 52 Akhmat games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Fakel 31% | Draw 37% | Akhmat 31%. Fair-value odds: Fakel 3.23 | Draw 2.70 | Akhmat 3.23. The draw (37%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 34% | BTTS probability 45% | Total xG 2.05. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 66% probability — total xG of 2.05 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 45% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

Fakel dominate the H2H record, yet Akhmat are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 37% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 31% and away win at 31% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.05 combined xG gives a 34% probability to Under 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by form averaging 1.8 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 3.0 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 45%. Form rates corroborate: Fakel 30% | Akhmat 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (3W–1D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Fakel but Poisson model leans Draw — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H suggests 3.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is only 2.05 — current-season defences are outperforming historical norms.
BTTS H2H BTTS history (80%) is contradicted by Poisson (45%) — recent defensive form has changed the dynamic.
Form Akhmat lead on PPG: 1.30 vs 0.40 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Fakel Poisson xG (1.02) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.40) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Form averages (~1.2 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.05) both support Under 2.5 goals (66% probability).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Akhmat — Akhmat at 31% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 37% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 34% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
Contradiction Fakel dominate the H2H record, yet Akhmat are the in-form side right now — historical edge versus current momentum creates a genuine dilemma.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Fakel vs Akhmat | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 23 | Venue: Stadion Fakel • Kick-off: Saturday 5 Apr 2025, 13:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Fakel 31% | Draw 37% | Akhmat 31% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 34% | BTTS 45% | xG Fakel 1.02 / Akhmat 1.03 • Poisson strength factors: Fakel attack 0.697 / def 0.996 | Akhmat attack 0.962 / def 0.969 | league avg home 1.517 / away 1.074 • Poisson stance: Draw (37%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.02

Fakel xG

Expected Goals

1.03

Akhmat xG

31%
37%
31%
Fakel Draw Akhmat

45%

BTTS

64%

Over 1.5

34%

Over 2.5

15%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Fakel vs Akhmat kick off?

Fakel vs Akhmat kicked off at 13:15 on Saturday 5 April 2025 at Stadion Fakel.

What was the final score in Fakel vs Akhmat?

Fakel 0 - 0 Akhmat.

Where is Fakel vs Akhmat being played?

The match is being played at Stadion Fakel.

What competition is Fakel vs Akhmat part of?

Fakel vs Akhmat is a Regular Season - 23 fixture in the Premier League (Russia).

Who is favourite to win Fakel vs Akhmat?

Our statistical model gives Fakel a 31% chance of winning, Akhmat a 31% chance, and a 37% chance of a draw, making this a very evenly-matched fixture.

Will both teams score in Fakel vs Akhmat?

Our model estimates a 45% probability that both Fakel and Akhmat will score (BTTS).

Will Fakel vs Akhmat have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 34%.

What is the head-to-head record between Fakel and Akhmat?

Record (5 meetings): Fakel 3W | Draws 1 | Akhmat 1W.

What form are Fakel and Akhmat in?

Fakel (all comps): 0W-4D-6L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 0.30 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-L-L-L-L. Akhmat (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.20 | L5 W-W-D-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Fakel's attack at 0.70x the league average against Akhmat's defence at 0.97x — combine the two and it projects 1.02 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Akhmat's attack (0.96x) against Fakel's defence (1.00x) — and the away total comes out at 1.03.

These ratings are built from 52/52 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 15.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 0-0 (14.6%), 0-1 (11.4%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 41% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Draw

31%

Fakel

3.21

37%

Draw

2.67

31%

Akhmat

3.18

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

13.5%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

13.2%

Away win

1 – 0

13.1%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.02

Fakel xG

Total xG

2.05

1.03

Akhmat xG

31%
37%
31%
FakelDrawAkhmat

3.21

31%

Home win

2.67

37%

Draw

3.18

31%

Away win

Goals Markets

61%

Over 1.5

1.64

39%

Under 1.5

2.56

34%

Over 2.5

2.94

66%

Under 2.5

1.52

15%

Over 3.5

6.67

85%

Under 3.5

1.18

6%

Over 4.5

16.67

94%

Under 4.5

1.06

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

45%

BTTS Yes

2.24

55%

BTTS No

1.81

Clean Sheet

36%

Fakel

2.80

36%

Akhmat

2.79

Win to Nil

11%

Fakel

8.97

11%

Akhmat

8.87

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 12.8 13.2 6.8 2.3 0.6 0.1
1 13.1 13.5 7.0 2.4 0.6 0.1
2 6.7 6.9 3.6 1.2 0.3 0.1
3 2.3 2.4 1.2 0.4 0.1
4 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1
5 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.025
λ Away (xG) 1.029
Total xG 2.054
League avg home goals 1.517
League avg away goals 1.074
Fakel attack strength 0.697
Fakel defence strength 0.996
Akhmat attack strength 0.962
Akhmat defence strength 0.969
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 52 / 52

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Fakel vs Akhmat?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.3%.

How many goals are Fakel and Akhmat expected to score?

The model projects 1.02 expected goals for Fakel and 1.03 for Akhmat, a combined total of 2.05.

How confident is the prediction model for Fakel vs Akhmat?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 37%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Fakel's recent record stands at 9W 19D 24L from 52 games, a 0.88 PPG return, with L-L-L-L-L in the last five. The sample for Fakel is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Akhmat, meanwhile, have gone 13W 15D 24L across 52 games — 1.04 PPG, with W-W-D-D-D in their last five. The sample for Akhmat is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 0.88 PPG for Fakel against 1.04 for Akhmat. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Fakel have managed 5W 13D 7L from 25 games — 1.12 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Akhmat's away record stands at 6W 6D 13L across 25 trips, a 0.96 PPG haul.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Fakel are averaging 0.63 goals scored and 1.25 conceded per game recently; Akhmat are on 1.02 scored and 1.54 conceded.

Last 52 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Fakel

Fakel

Blended
L L L L L
Akhmat

Akhmat

Blended
W W D D D
52 Played 52
9/19/24 W / D / L 13/15/24
0.88 Points Per Game 1.04
0.63 Avg Goals Scored 1.02
1.25 Avg Goals Conceded 1.54
1.88 Avg Goals / Game 2.56
18 Clean Sheets 13
18 BTTS 27
14 Over 2.5 Games 23
Fakel

Fakel

L
A FC Krasnodar
0–5 HT 0–0
30 Mar
L
A FC Orenburg
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
H Zenit
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Mar
L
A Khimki
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Mar
L
H CSKA Moscow
0–1 HT 0–1
08 Dec
D
A Dinamo Makhachkala
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Dec
D
H Dynamo
1–1 HT 0–1
24 Nov
L
A Lokomotiv
1–2 HT 0–1
09 Nov
D
H Khimki
1–1 HT 1–1
03 Nov
D
A CSKA Moscow
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Oct
W
A Akhmat
3–2 HT 1–2
18 Oct
D
H Dinamo Makhachkala
1–1 HT 0–1
06 Oct
D
H Rubin
0–0 HT 0–0
27 Sep
L
A Zenit
1–3 HT 1–0
21 Sep
D
H Nizhny Novgorod
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
L
A FC Rostov
1–4 HT 0–2
01 Sep
W
H FC Orenburg
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
A Spartak Moscow
0–3 HT 0–2
18 Aug
L
A Krylia Sovetov
0–2 HT 0–0
11 Aug
D
H FC Krasnodar
0–0 HT 0–0
04 Aug
L
H Akron
0–2 HT 0–0
27 Jul
L
A Dynamo
1–3 HT 0–3
20 Jul
W
H Akhmat
2–0 HT 1–0
25 May
L
A Lokomotiv
0–2 HT 0–1
18 May
D
H Ural
0–0 HT 0–0
12 May
D
H Zenit
1–1 HT 0–1
06 May
D
A FC Sochi
0–0 HT 0–0
29 Apr
L
H Krylia Sovetov
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Apr
L
A FC Krasnodar
0–2 HT 0–0
19 Apr
L
H FC Rostov
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
L
A CSKA Moscow
1–4 HT 0–1
07 Apr
D
H FC Orenburg
0–0 HT 0–0
31 Mar
W
A Spartak Moscow
2–0 HT 1–0
10 Mar
D
A Nizhny Novgorod
1–1 HT 1–0
03 Mar
D
H Dynamo
1–1 HT 0–1
10 Dec
D
H Baltika
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
A Rubin
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Nov
D
H CSKA Moscow
1–1 HT 0–1
11 Nov
W
A Akhmat
2–1 HT 0–1
04 Nov
W
H Spartak Moscow
2–0 HT 0–0
28 Oct
W
A FC Orenburg
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Oct
D
A Dynamo
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
W
H FC Sochi
2–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
L
H Rubin
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Sep
D
A Ural
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Sep
L
A Krylia Sovetov
0–3 HT 0–1
02 Sep
D
H FC Krasnodar
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug
W
H Nizhny Novgorod
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
A Zenit
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Aug
L
A Baltika
1–2 HT 1–1
06 Aug
L
H Lokomotiv
1–4 HT 1–1
30 Jul
L
A FC Rostov
1–2 HT 1–1
23 Jul
Akhmat

Akhmat

D
H Spartak Moscow
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Mar
D
A Khimki
1–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
D
A Lokomotiv
1–1 HT 1–1
07 Mar
W
H Rubin
2–1 HT 1–1
01 Mar
W
H FC Orenburg
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Dec
D
H Dynamo
1–1 HT 1–0
02 Dec
L
A Krylia Sovetov
1–2 HT 1–0
24 Nov
L
H Zenit
1–2 HT 1–2
10 Nov
L
H Nizhny Novgorod
0–2 HT 0–0
03 Nov
W
A FC Rostov
3–2 HT 2–1
26 Oct
L
H Fakel
2–3 HT 2–1
18 Oct
L
A Rubin
0–2 HT 0–1
05 Oct
L
A CSKA Moscow
0–3 HT 0–2
28 Sep
D
H Krylia Sovetov
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Sep
L
A Dynamo
2–4 HT 0–1
15 Sep
D
H Akron
0–0 HT 0–0
31 Aug
D
H Khimki
3–3 HT 0–1
24 Aug
L
A Dinamo Makhachkala
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Aug
D
A Spartak Moscow
0–0 HT 0–0
11 Aug
L
H Lokomotiv
0–5 HT 0–3
04 Aug
D
A FC Orenburg
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Jul
D
H FC Krasnodar
1–1 HT 1–1
21 Jul
L
A Fakel
0–2 HT 0–1
25 May
L
H Zenit
1–5 HT 1–3
19 May
W
A Krylia Sovetov
2–0 HT 1–0
10 May
W
A FC Krasnodar
1–0 HT 0–0
04 May
W
H Nizhny Novgorod
5–1 HT 2–1
28 Apr
W
H FC Sochi
1–0 HT 1–0
25 Apr
W
A CSKA Moscow
2–1 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H Baltika
1–7 HT 0–5
13 Apr
L
H Lokomotiv
0–2 HT 0–1
07 Apr
L
A Rubin
1–2 HT 0–2
31 Mar
L
A Dynamo
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Mar
W
H Ural
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Mar
D
H FC Rostov
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Dec
W
H Spartak Moscow
2–1 HT 1–1
03 Dec
D
A FC Orenburg
1–1 HT 0–0
26 Nov
L
A Lokomotiv
1–2 HT 0–0
11 Nov
L
H Fakel
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Nov
L
A Zenit
1–2 HT 1–2
28 Oct
L
A FC Rostov
0–3 HT 0–2
22 Oct
L
H Rubin
0–1 HT 0–1
08 Oct
D
H Dynamo
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Oct
L
A Baltika
0–1 HT 0–1
23 Sep
D
H FC Krasnodar
1–1 HT 1–1
16 Sep
W
A Ural
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Sep
D
A Spartak Moscow
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Aug
W
H FC Orenburg
4–0 HT 3–0
20 Aug
L
A Nizhny Novgorod
0–2 HT 0–2
14 Aug
W
A FC Sochi
2–1 HT 2–1
06 Aug
L
H CSKA Moscow
2–3 HT 2–2
30 Jul
L
H Krylia Sovetov
1–2 HT 0–1
22 Jul

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Fakel and Akhmat in coming into this match?

Fakel have gone 9W 19D 24L in their last 52 games (0.88 PPG), while Akhmat have gone 13W 15D 24L in their last 52 (1.04 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Fakel at home or Akhmat away?

Fakel's home record (1.12 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Fakel at home: 1.12 PPG; Akhmat away: 0.96 PPG.

Have Fakel or Akhmat been keeping clean sheets recently?

Fakel have kept a clean sheet in 35% of their recent games, Akhmat in 25%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 7 times since July 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. The two were last together as recently as 10 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Records & Recent Trends

The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Fakel have gone 1W 3D 0L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Akhmat — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 7 Meetings

Fakel

3

Fakel

3

Draws

Akhmat

1

Akhmat

Recent Meetings

Fakel
0–0
10 Aug 26
Akhmat
Fakel
0–0
05 Apr 25
Akhmat
Akhmat
2–3
18 Oct 24
Fakel
Fakel
2–0
25 May 24
Akhmat
Akhmat
1–2
04 Nov 23
Fakel
Fakel
1–1
16 Apr 23
Akhmat
Akhmat
2–1
24 Jul 22
Fakel

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Fakel and Akhmat?

From 7 meetings on record, Fakel have won 3, Akhmat have won 1, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Fakel and Akhmat last play each other?

They last met on 10 August 2026, when Fakel 0-0 Akhmat.

Who has won more matches between Fakel and Akhmat?

Fakel have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 7 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Fakel see a goal before the break in 44% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.

Akhmat are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Fakel 28%, Akhmat 44% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Low-scoring games have been more typical here — Over 2.5 sits at just 4% for Fakel and 40% for Akhmat.

On the defensive side: Fakel keep a clean sheet in 48% of their matches; Fakel have failed to score in 52% of games; Akhmat in 44%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Fakel home games / Akhmat away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Fakel Fakel Blended
Metric All
(52 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/52
(55.8%)
11/25
(44%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/52
(15.4%)
2/25
(8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/23
(47.8%)
7/14
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/23
(26.1%)
3/14
(21.4%)
Winning at HT 6/52
(11.5%)
2/25
(8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/52
(3.8%)
0/25
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/52
(13.5%)
5/25
(20%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 18/52
(34.6%)
7/25
(28%)
Over 2.5 Goals 14/52
(26.9%)
1/25
(4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 7/52
(13.5%)
1/25
(4%)
Clean Sheet 18/52
(34.6%)
12/25
(48%)
Failed to Score 28/52
(53.8%)
13/25
(52%)
Akhmat Akhmat Blended
Metric All
(52 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/52
(69.2%)
16/25
(64%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/52
(38.5%)
8/25
(32%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/16
(62.5%)
6/9
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/16
(37.5%)
4/9
(44.4%)
Winning at HT 12/52
(23.1%)
5/25
(20%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/52
(9.6%)
1/25
(4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/52
(1.9%)
0/25
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 27/52
(51.9%)
11/25
(44%)
Over 2.5 Goals 23/52
(44.2%)
10/25
(40%)
Over 3.5 Goals 10/52
(19.2%)
2/25
(8%)
Clean Sheet 13/52
(25%)
6/25
(24%)
Failed to Score 18/52
(34.6%)
11/25
(44%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Fakel play Akhmat?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 28% of Fakel's recent matches and 44% of Akhmat's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Fakel vs Akhmat usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 4% of Fakel's recent games and 40% of Akhmat's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Fakel and Akhmat tend to score early?

Fakel have had a goal before half-time in 44% of their recent matches, Akhmat in 64% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Stalemate at Fakel's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Stadion Fakel, Regular Season - 23, as Fakel and Akhmat drew 0-0 in the Premier League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Fakel 1.02 xG and Akhmat 1.03 xG, a combined 2.05. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Fakel fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Akhmat landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Fakel attack 0.70 / defence 1.00 against Akhmat attack 0.96 / defence 0.97, drawn from 52/52 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Fakel 31% | Draw 37% | Akhmat 31%, with the draw its most likely call at 37%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 64% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 45% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 36% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Fakel 27%, Akhmat 44%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 43%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Fakel's trading profile (52 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 35% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 54% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Akhmat's trading profile (52 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Fakel 0.88 PPG, Akhmat 1.04 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Akhmat (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.80 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.40 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). The data earned its keep here, calling the bulk of the fixture correctly.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 34% Over 2.5 probability, 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 45% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 36% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.