🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours FC Porto (40%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Casa Pia face FC Porto.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

plays host to Casa Pia versus FC Porto in Primeira Liga, Regular Season - 6. Kick-off: Sunday 13 September 2026 at 16:00 UTC.

Form

Casa Pia (all games): 2W 4D 4L across 10 Primeira Liga fixtures this term — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L W D D W. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 0.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Casa Pia haven't played a Primeira Liga game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

Casa Pia at this season: 3W 5D 2L from 10 home games — 1.40 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

FC Porto's overall Primeira Liga record this term: 7W 2D 1L from 10 games (2.30 PPG). Last five: W W W L W. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 1.00. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. FC Porto haven't played a Primeira Liga game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

FC Porto's away record: 7W 1D 2L from 10 road trips in Primeira Liga this season (2.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

On a straight form reading, FC Porto are the stronger side — 1.30 PPG clear of the hosts (2.30 vs 1.00). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Casa Pia have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, FC Porto in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

Head-to-Head

The head-to-head ledger leans to FC Porto, who have claimed 6 wins from 8 meetings compared to 1 for the hosts, with 1 draws.

The 8 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 2 Feb 2026, ended 2–1 with Casa Pia winning.

It is worth noting that FC Porto have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 6 wins from 8 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading

Casa Pia half-time and goal-timing data (34 games, 17 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 29% of games (home games); they fail to score in 44% of games.

FC Porto half-time and goal-timing data (34 games, 17 at away): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 91% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; they lead at the break 59% of the time; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 62% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Casa Pia 47% versus FC Porto 38%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Casa Pia 44% | FC Porto 56%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Casa Pia 1.17 xG and FC Porto 1.32 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Casa Pia attack 0.841 / defence 1.003 | FC Porto attack 1.169 / defence 0.920. League average goals — home 1.509 / away 1.127. Data: 34 Casa Pia games / 34 FC Porto games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Casa Pia 33% | Draw 27% | FC Porto 40%. Fair-value odds: Casa Pia 3.03 | Draw 3.70 | FC Porto 2.50. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 27% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 45% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.49. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 55% — total xG of 2.49 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is FC Porto at 40% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on FC Porto if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.49 combined xG gives a 45% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 51%. Form rates corroborate: Casa Pia 60% | FC Porto 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (34 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights