🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Jagiellonia at 37% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Piast Gliwice vs Jagiellonia encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Ekstraklasa encounter, Regular Season - 8 sees Jagiellonia travel to Stadion Miejski w Gliwicach to take on Piast Gliwice. The game is scheduled for Saturday 13 September 2025, 19:15 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Piast Gliwice stand at 2W 4D 4L from 10 Ekstraklasa matches — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L L D D D. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 1.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. Piast Gliwice have played only a handful of Ekstraklasa games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

In front of their own supporters this season, Piast Gliwice have posted 3W 4D 3L at Stadion Miejski w Gliwicach — 1.30 PPG. At home they are averaging 0.80 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Across all Ekstraklasa games this season, Jagiellonia have recorded 5W 3D 2L from 10 outings — 1.80 PPG. Last five: L W W W W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.60. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. Jagiellonia have played only a handful of Ekstraklasa games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Jagiellonia's form when playing away from home: 4W 3D 3L across 10 road games this term (1.50 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Form points away from home here. Jagiellonia's 1.80 PPG return is 0.80 points per game ahead of Piast Gliwice's 1.00 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 8 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Piast Gliwice, 2 for Jagiellonia and 5 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 8 previous meetings have averaged 2.2 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 6 Apr 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

In-Play Profile

Piast Gliwice in-play tendencies (39 games, 18 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 39% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 33% of games (home games); they fail to score in 41% of games.

Jagiellonia in-play tendencies (39 games, 18 at away): they score before half-time in 83% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 75% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Piast Gliwice 41% versus Jagiellonia 62%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Piast Gliwice 31% | Jagiellonia 54%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Piast Gliwice 0.95 xG and Jagiellonia 1.05 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Piast Gliwice attack 0.695 / defence 0.814 | Jagiellonia attack 1.084 / defence 0.869. League average goals — home 1.579 / away 1.188. Piast Gliwice's attack strength of 0.695 is below the league average — the 0.95 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 39 Piast Gliwice games / 39 Jagiellonia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Piast Gliwice 32% | Draw 31% | Jagiellonia 37%. Fair-value odds: Piast Gliwice 3.12 | Draw 3.23 | Jagiellonia 2.70. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 32% | BTTS probability 40% | Total xG 2.00. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 68% probability — total xG of 2.00 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 40% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Jagiellonia at 37% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 31% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Jagiellonia offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.00 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 32% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.1 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 40%. Form rates are neutral: Piast Gliwice 30% | Jagiellonia 70%.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights