🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Arka Gdynia at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this Arka Gdynia vs Motor Lublin fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Stadion Miejski w Gdyni plays host to Arka Gdynia versus Motor Lublin in Ekstraklasa, Regular Season - 18. Kick-off: Saturday 6 December 2025 at 11:15 UTC.

Form

Arka Gdynia (all games): 3W 1D 6L across 10 Ekstraklasa fixtures this term — 1.00 PPG. Last five: W L W L L. They are averaging 0.90 goals per game and conceding 2.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.40 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Arka Gdynia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Arka Gdynia's form when playing at home: 5W 2D 1L across 8 games at Stadion Miejski w Gdyni this term (2.12 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.12 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 75% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.12 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.00 — Arka Gdynia are significantly better at Stadion Miejski w Gdyni than their overall form suggests.

Motor Lublin have collected 1.20 PPG across 10 Ekstraklasa outings this season: 2W 6D 2L. Last five: W D D W D. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.70. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Motor Lublin, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Motor Lublin's form when playing away from home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.00 PPG for Arka Gdynia against 1.20 for Motor Lublin. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Arka Gdynia have seen both teams score in 75% of their games, Motor Lublin in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Arka Gdynia lead 0W to 1W over the last 1 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 1 previous contests averaged 1.0 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 20 Jul 2025, ended 0–1 with Motor Lublin winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading

Arka Gdynia half-time and goal-timing data (17 games, 8 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 60% of the time; BTTS occurs in 75% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 35%; they fail to score in 47% of games.

Motor Lublin half-time and goal-timing data (17 games, 8 at away): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 62% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 41%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Arka Gdynia 47% versus Motor Lublin 65%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Arka Gdynia 53% | Motor Lublin 53%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Arka Gdynia 1.68 xG and Motor Lublin 1.53 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Arka Gdynia attack 0.994 / defence 1.148 | Motor Lublin attack 1.085 / defence 1.021. League average goals — home 1.649 / away 1.229. Data: 17 Arka Gdynia games / 50 Motor Lublin games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Arka Gdynia 39% | Draw 28% | Motor Lublin 33%. Fair-value odds: Arka Gdynia 2.56 | Draw 3.57 | Motor Lublin 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 62% | BTTS probability 66% | Total xG 3.21. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 62% — the 3.21 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 66% reflects that both xG figures (1.68 / 1.53) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Arka Gdynia as the most likely outcome at 39% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Arka Gdynia if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.21 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 62% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 66% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Arka Gdynia 75% | Motor Lublin 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights