Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Prediction vindicated as Molde edge out Ham-Kam 1-0.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Molde beat Ham-Kam 1-0 at Aker Stadion, Regular Season - 17, in the Eliteserien. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Molde 1.64 xG and Ham-Kam 1.17 xG, a combined 2.81. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Ham-Kam landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Molde attack 1.04 / defence 0.96 against Ham-Kam attack 0.90 / defence 0.94, drawn from 46/46 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Molde 48% | Draw 25% | Ham-Kam 27%, with Molde to win its most likely call at 48%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 53%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 77% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 55% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Molde 67%, Ham-Kam 44%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Molde's trading profile (46 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one.
Ham-Kam's trading profile (46 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 39% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
On form, Molde arrived the stronger side — 1.57 PPG against 1.09. That form edge translated into the three points. Molde (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.22 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.48 average — tighter than their form line. Ham-Kam (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.17 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.