🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Tromso at 42% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Ham-Kam vs Tromso encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Tromso make the trip to Briskeby Arena to face Ham-Kam in Eliteserien, Regular Season - 10. The match kicks off on Sunday 22 June 2025 at 16:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Ham-Kam have collected 0.90 PPG across 10 Eliteserien outings this season: 2W 3D 5L. Last five: W D L L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes.

Ham-Kam's form when playing at home: 3W 3D 4L across 10 games at Briskeby Arena this term (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Tromso (all games): 2W 3D 5L across 10 Eliteserien outings this term — 0.90 points per game. Last five: L D L W L. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

Tromso's form when playing away from home: 3W 1D 6L across 10 road games this term (1.00 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

A near-identical PPG reading — 0.90 for Ham-Kam, 0.90 for Tromso — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Both sides have a strong clean-sheet tendency (using home/away splits) — Ham-Kam have seen both teams score in just 20% of their games, Tromso in only 20%. BTTS No has clear statistical support from both squads' form records.

Head-to-Head

Tromso hold the superior head-to-head record in this fixture, claiming 4 wins from 6 meetings. The hosts have won just 0 times in that span.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.0 per game across 6 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 3 Nov 2024, ended 3–3 with a draw.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. Tromso have won 4 of 6 previous encounters, and at 3.0 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

Trading & In-Play

Ham-Kam — key trading statistics (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; BTTS occurs in 30% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 40% of games (home games); they fail to score in 38% of games.

Tromso — key trading statistics (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); they fail to score in 30% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Ham-Kam 42% versus Tromso 48%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ham-Kam 48% | Tromso 57%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ham-Kam 1.57 xG and Tromso 1.74 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ham-Kam attack 1.002 / defence 1.018 | Tromso attack 1.161 / defence 1.042. League average goals — home 1.508 / away 1.472. Data: 39 Ham-Kam games / 39 Tromso games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ham-Kam 35% | Draw 23% | Tromso 42%. Fair-value odds: Ham-Kam 2.86 | Draw 4.35 | Tromso 2.38. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 23% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 64% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.31. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 64% — the 3.31 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.57 / 1.74) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Form averages suggest only ~1.6 goals/game but Poisson projects Over 2.5 at 64% — underlying attack/defence strengths imply more goals than surface form shows. Form shows strong BTTS No rates for both sides but Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — current-season attack strengths are higher than recent results suggest.

Poisson rates Tromso as the most likely outcome at 42% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 23% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Tromso if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.31 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 64% — reasonable confidence, supported by H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 65% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Ham-Kam 20% | Tromso 20% from recent games — a notable divergence.

Multiple data sources are pointing in different directions on the likely outcome — reduce stake size to reflect the analytical uncertainty. The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights