🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Rosenborg at 43% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Ham-Kam vs Rosenborg encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Rosenborg make the trip to Briskeby Arena to face Ham-Kam in Eliteserien, Regular Season - 23. The match kicks off on Sunday 28 September 2025 at 16:00 UTC.

Form

Ham-Kam (all games): 2W 2D 6L across 10 Eliteserien fixtures this term — 0.80 PPG. Last five: W D L L L. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Ham-Kam, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Ham-Kam's form when playing at home: 2W 3D 5L across 10 games at Briskeby Arena this term (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Rosenborg have collected 1.20 PPG across 10 Eliteserien outings this season: 3W 3D 4L. Last five: W L L W D. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.70. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Rosenborg, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Rosenborg's form when playing away from home: 3W 2D 5L across 10 road games this term (1.10 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. 4 clean sheets from 10 away games (40%) shows they are capable of shutting up shop on the road.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.80 PPG for Ham-Kam against 1.20 for Rosenborg. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

Head-to-Head

The head-to-head ledger leans to Rosenborg, who have claimed 5 wins from 7 meetings compared to 1 for the hosts, with 1 draws.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.4 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 13 Jul 2025, ended 0–2 with Rosenborg winning.

It is worth noting that Rosenborg have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 5 wins from 7 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading

Ham-Kam half-time and goal-timing data (51 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (home games); they fail to score in 39% of games.

Rosenborg half-time and goal-timing data (51 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 85% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 65% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 35%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Ham-Kam 45% versus Rosenborg 55%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ham-Kam 45% | Rosenborg 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ham-Kam 1.35 xG and Rosenborg 1.59 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ham-Kam attack 0.789 / defence 1.182 | Rosenborg attack 0.989 / defence 1.042. League average goals — home 1.646 / away 1.356. Ham-Kam's attack strength of 0.789 is below the league average — the 1.35 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 52 Ham-Kam games / 51 Rosenborg games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ham-Kam 32% | Draw 25% | Rosenborg 43%. Fair-value odds: Ham-Kam 3.12 | Draw 4.00 | Rosenborg 2.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.94. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.94 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Rosenborg at 43% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Rosenborg if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 2.94 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 56% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 59% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Ham-Kam 80% | Rosenborg 40% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights