🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Ham-Kam at 39%, yet in-form Brann provide a compelling counter-argument — this Ham-Kam vs Brann fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Ham-Kam and Brann meet at Briskeby Arena in Eliteserien, Regular Season - 12. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 5 July 2025 at 13:00 UTC.

Current Form

Ham-Kam's overall Eliteserien record this term: 2W 3D 5L from 10 games (0.90 PPG). Last five: D W W L D. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Ham-Kam, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Ham-Kam have posted 4W 1D 5L at Briskeby Arena — 1.30 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game.

Brann (all games): 6W 2D 2L across 10 Eliteserien outings this term — 2.00 points per game. Last five: W L W L W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.50. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Brann, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Brann have gone 6W 1D 3L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.90 PPG). Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

On a straight form reading, Brann are the stronger side — 1.10 PPG clear of the hosts (2.00 vs 0.90). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

Head-to-Head

Brann hold the superior head-to-head record in this fixture, claiming 4 wins from 4 meetings. The hosts have won just 0 times in that span.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.2 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 1 Jun 2024, ended 1–2 with Brann winning.

It is worth noting that Brann have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 4 wins from 4 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading Data

Ham-Kam goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (41 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (home games); they fail to score in 42% of games.

Brann goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (41 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 58% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Ham-Kam 44% versus Brann 58%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ham-Kam 44% | Brann 66%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Ham-Kam 1.64 xG and Brann 1.59 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ham-Kam attack 0.960 / defence 1.128 | Brann attack 1.005 / defence 1.105. League average goals — home 1.542 / away 1.408. Data: 41 Ham-Kam games / 43 Brann games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Ham-Kam 39% | Draw 24% | Brann 37%. Fair-value odds: Ham-Kam 2.56 | Draw 4.17 | Brann 2.70. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 64% | Total xG 3.23. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.23 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 64% reflects that both xG figures (1.64 / 1.59) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, Ham-Kam are the pick at 39% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Brann (2.00 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Ham-Kam if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.23 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 63% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 64% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Ham-Kam 40% | Brann 50%.

The outsider holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights