🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Waalwijk's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Waalwijk and Heracles finished level at 0-0 at Mandemakers Stadion, Regular Season - 28, in the Eredivisie. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Waalwijk 1.69 xG and Heracles 1.09 xG, a combined 2.78. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Waalwijk fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Heracles landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Waalwijk attack 0.95 / defence 1.12 against Heracles attack 0.72 / defence 1.12, drawn from 61/61 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Waalwijk 51% | Draw 24% | Heracles 24%, with Waalwijk to win its most likely call at 51%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 53%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 77% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 61% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Waalwijk 59%, Heracles 62%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Waalwijk's trading profile (61 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 31% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Heracles's trading profile (61 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 36% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Waalwijk 0.77 PPG, Heracles 1.05 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Waalwijk (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.23 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.60 average — tighter than their form line. Heracles (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.83 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.20 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights