Sign in Register

PEC Zwolle 1-0 Utrecht – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Eredivisie · Regular Season - 3

Kick-off

Sun 27 Aug 2023

11:15

Venue

MAC³PARK Stadion

Competition

Eredivisie

Netherlands

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Utrecht at 39%, yet other data sources diverge — this PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

PEC Zwolle and Utrecht meet at MAC³PARK Stadion in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 3. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 27 August 2023 at 11:15 UTC.

Current Form

PEC Zwolle's overall Eredivisie record this term: 5W 1D 4L from 10 games (1.60 PPG). Last five: L W W L L. They are averaging 2.00 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. PEC Zwolle have played only a handful of Eredivisie games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

PEC Zwolle's home record at MAC³PARK Stadion: 9W 0D 1L from 10 Eredivisie appearances (2.70 PPG). They are averaging 3.70 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at MAC³PARK Stadion. Their home PPG of 2.70 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.60 — PEC Zwolle are significantly better at MAC³PARK Stadion than their overall form suggests.

Utrecht have collected 1.50 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 5W 0D 5L. Last five: W L W L L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 1.40 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Utrecht have played only a handful of Eredivisie games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Utrecht's form when playing away from home: 4W 2D 4L across 10 road games this term (1.40 PPG). They are averaging 1.80 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.60 PPG for PEC Zwolle against 1.50 for Utrecht. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — PEC Zwolle lead 0W to 1W over the last 2 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 4.0 per game across 2 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 7 May 2022, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

PEC Zwolle half-time and goal-timing data (38 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 86% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; they lead at the break 47% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 63% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 53%.

Utrecht half-time and goal-timing data (38 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 77% of the time; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 74% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — PEC Zwolle 58% versus Utrecht 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (PEC Zwolle 68% | Utrecht 58%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects PEC Zwolle 1.47 xG and Utrecht 1.62 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: PEC Zwolle attack 0.818 / defence 1.160 | Utrecht attack 0.953 / defence 0.982. League average goals — home 1.826 / away 1.466. Data: 2 PEC Zwolle games / 36 Utrecht games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: PEC Zwolle 33% | Draw 28% | Utrecht 39%. Fair-value odds: PEC Zwolle 3.03 | Draw 3.57 | Utrecht 2.56. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 60% | BTTS probability 64% | Total xG 3.09. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 60% — the 3.09 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 64% reflects that both xG figures (1.47 / 1.62) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Utrecht at 39% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Utrecht if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.09 combined xG gives a 60% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 3.9 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 64%. Form rates are neutral: PEC Zwolle 40% | Utrecht 50%.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects. The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (2 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (4.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.09) both back Over 2.5 goals (60% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 64% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form PEC Zwolle Poisson xG (1.47) is below their recent form scoring rate (3.70) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~3.3 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.09) both support Over 2.5 goals at 60%.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 60% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 64% — model favours both teams scoring.
Market Poisson model is blending current and prior-season data with limited current-season samples (2/36 games) — model confidence is moderate; treat probability edges as indicative rather than definitive.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht | Competition: Eredivisie, Regular Season - 3 | Venue: MAC³PARK Stadion • Kick-off: Sunday 27 Aug 2023, 11:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: PEC Zwolle 33% | Draw 28% | Utrecht 39% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 60% | BTTS 64% | xG PEC Zwolle 1.47 / Utrecht 1.62 • Poisson strength factors: PEC Zwolle attack 0.818 / def 1.160 | Utrecht attack 0.953 / def 0.982 | league avg home 1.826 / away 1.466 • Poisson stance: Utrecht (39%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.47

PEC Zwolle xG

Expected Goals

1.62

Utrecht xG

33%
28%
39%
PEC Zwolle Draw Utrecht

64%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

60%

Over 2.5

37%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht kick off?

PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht kicked off at 11:15 on Sunday 27 August 2023 at MAC³PARK Stadion.

What was the final score in PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht?

PEC Zwolle 1 - 0 Utrecht.

Where is PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht being played?

The match is being played at MAC³PARK Stadion.

What competition is PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht part of?

PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht is a Regular Season - 3 fixture in the Eredivisie (Netherlands).

Who is favourite to win PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht?

Our statistical model gives PEC Zwolle a 33% chance of winning, Utrecht a 39% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making Utrecht the favourite.

Will both teams score in PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht?

Our model estimates a 64% probability that both PEC Zwolle and Utrecht will score (BTTS).

Will PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 60%.

What is the head-to-head record between PEC Zwolle and Utrecht?

Record (2 meetings): PEC Zwolle 0W | Draws 1 | Utrecht 1W.

What form are PEC Zwolle and Utrecht in?

PEC Zwolle (all comps): 5W-1D-4L in 10 | 1.60 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 1.60 | L5 L-W-W-L-L. Utrecht (all comps): 5W-0D-5L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-L-W-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

The model rates PEC Zwolle's attack at 0.82x the league average against Utrecht's defence at 0.98x — combine the two and it projects 1.47 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Utrecht's attack (0.95x) against PEC Zwolle's defence (1.16x) — and the away total comes out at 1.62.

The sample (2/36 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (8.8%), 2-1 (8.0%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Utrecht Win

33%

PEC Zwolle

3.07

28%

Draw

3.55

39%

Utrecht

2.55

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.8%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 2

8.8%

Away win

2 – 1

8.0%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.47

PEC Zwolle xG

Total xG

3.09

1.62

Utrecht xG

33%
28%
39%
PEC ZwolleDrawUtrecht

3.07

33%

Home win

3.55

28%

Draw

2.55

39%

Away win

Goals Markets

81%

Over 1.5

1.23

19%

Under 1.5

5.26

60%

Over 2.5

1.67

40%

Under 2.5

2.50

37%

Over 3.5

2.70

63%

Under 3.5

1.59

20%

Over 4.5

5.00

80%

Under 4.5

1.25

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

64%

BTTS Yes

1.56

36%

BTTS No

2.77

Clean Sheet

20%

PEC Zwolle

5.06

23%

Utrecht

4.34

Win to Nil

6%

PEC Zwolle

15.52

9%

Utrecht

11.05

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.6 7.4 6.0 3.2 1.3 0.4
1 6.7 10.8 8.8 4.7 1.9 0.6
2 4.9 8.0 6.4 3.5 1.4 0.5
3 2.4 3.9 3.2 1.7 0.7 0.2
4 0.9 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.1
5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.467
λ Away (xG) 1.621
Total xG 3.088
League avg home goals 1.826
League avg away goals 1.466
PEC Zwolle attack strength 0.818
PEC Zwolle defence strength 1.160
Utrecht attack strength 0.953
Utrecht defence strength 0.982
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 2 / 36

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.3%.

How many goals are PEC Zwolle and Utrecht expected to score?

The model projects 1.47 expected goals for PEC Zwolle and 1.62 for Utrecht, a combined total of 3.09.

How confident is the prediction model for PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 39%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

PEC Zwolle's recent record stands at 25W 4D 9L from 38 games, a 2.08 PPG return, with L-W-W-L-L in the last five. It's still early in the season for PEC Zwolle, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Utrecht, meanwhile, have gone 16W 9D 13L across 38 games — 1.50 PPG, with W-L-W-L-L in their last five. It's still early in the season for Utrecht, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

The points-per-game comparison favours PEC Zwolle by 0.58 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Utrecht heading into this one.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, PEC Zwolle have managed 14W 2D 3L from 19 games — 2.32 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Utrecht's away record stands at 8W 4D 7L across 19 trips, a 1.47 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, PEC Zwolle come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

PEC Zwolle are averaging 2.47 goals scored and 1.24 conceded per game recently; Utrecht are on 1.50 scored and 1.47 conceded.

Defensively: PEC Zwolle have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 38 Results — Eredivisie

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

PEC Zwolle

PEC Zwolle

Early Season
L W W L L
Utrecht

Utrecht

Early Season
W L W L L
38 Played 38
25/4/9 W / D / L 16/9/13
2.08 Points Per Game 1.50
2.47 Avg Goals Scored 1.50
1.24 Avg Goals Conceded 1.47
3.71 Avg Goals / Game 2.97
14 Clean Sheets 13
22 BTTS 20
26 Over 2.5 Games 22
PEC Zwolle

PEC Zwolle

L
A Twente
1–3 HT 1–1
20 Aug
L
H Sparta Rotterdam
1–2 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Helmond Sport
3–2 HT 1–2
19 May
W
H Roda
3–1 HT 1–0
12 May
L
A Jong PSV U21
1–3 HT 1–1
08 May
W
H Dordrecht
4–0 HT 4–0
28 Apr
D
A Almere City FC
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
W
H Telstar
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
L
A FC Eindhoven
2–4 HT 2–2
07 Apr
W
H Jong Utrecht
2–0 HT 0–0
31 Mar
W
H NAC Breda
2–0 HT 0–0
17 Mar
W
A De Graafschap
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Mar
W
A Willem II
3–2 HT 2–1
10 Mar
W
H Den Bosch
13–0 HT 7–0
03 Mar
L
A MVV
2–3 HT 2–1
27 Feb
L
A ADO Den Haag
1–3 HT 1–2
17 Feb
W
H Jong AZ
4–1 HT 3–0
10 Feb
D
A Jong Ajax
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Feb
W
A Roda
2–1 HT 2–0
30 Jan
W
H FC OSS
4–1 HT 1–0
27 Jan
W
H VVV Venlo
2–0 HT 0–0
20 Jan
W
A Heracles
3–0 HT 3–0
15 Jan
W
H Almere City FC
3–2 HT 1–1
06 Jan
W
H Helmond Sport
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Dec
W
A NAC Breda
2–0 HT 2–0
19 Nov
W
H FC Eindhoven
5–2 HT 2–1
11 Nov
W
A FC OSS
5–0 HT 2–0
04 Nov
L
H MVV
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Oct
W
A Jong Utrecht
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Oct
W
H Heracles
3–2 HT 3–1
14 Oct
L
A Dordrecht
0–3 HT 0–1
07 Oct
D
H Jong Ajax
1–1 HT 0–0
30 Sep
L
H ADO Den Haag
1–2 HT 1–1
16 Sep
W
A Jong AZ
3–2 HT 1–1
12 Sep
D
H Willem II
2–2 HT 2–2
09 Sep
W
A Den Bosch
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Sep
W
H Jong PSV U21
4–2 HT 3–0
26 Aug
W
A VVV Venlo
4–0 HT 2–0
21 Aug
Utrecht

Utrecht

L
H Heerenveen
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
A PSV Eindhoven
0–2 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Sparta Rotterdam
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Jun
L
H Sparta Rotterdam
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Jun
W
H Emmen
3–2 HT 1–1
28 May
L
A Ajax
1–3 HT 0–1
21 May
W
H Waalwijk
2–0 HT 0–0
13 May
W
A Cambuur
3–0 HT 2–0
06 May
L
A Feyenoord
1–3 HT 0–1
23 Apr
W
H Twente
1–0 HT 0–0
16 Apr
W
A Groningen
2–1 HT 1–1
07 Apr
D
H FC Volendam
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Apr
L
H GO Ahead Eagles
1–2 HT 1–1
18 Mar
D
A NEC Nijmegen
2–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
L
H Fortuna Sittard
1–2 HT 0–0
03 Mar
W
A Sparta Rotterdam
3–0 HT 0–0
24 Feb
D
H PSV Eindhoven
2–2 HT 1–1
19 Feb
L
A Vitesse
0–2 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Heerenveen
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Feb
D
A AZ Alkmaar
5–5 HT 3–3
28 Jan
W
H Excelsior
1–0 HT 1–0
25 Jan
L
A Twente
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Jan
D
A GO Ahead Eagles
2–2 HT 2–1
15 Jan
D
H Feyenoord
1–1 HT 1–0
08 Jan
W
A FC Volendam
4–0 HT 1–0
12 Nov
W
H Groningen
2–1 HT 0–1
06 Nov
W
A Heerenveen
2–1 HT 1–1
29 Oct
W
H Sparta Rotterdam
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Oct
L
A PSV Eindhoven
1–6 HT 1–3
16 Oct
L
H AZ Alkmaar
1–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Excelsior
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Oct
D
H NEC Nijmegen
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Sep
W
H Vitesse
1–0 HT 0–0
11 Sep
W
A Fortuna Sittard
4–3 HT 0–0
02 Sep
L
H Ajax
0–2 HT 0–2
28 Aug
L
A Emmen
2–3 HT 2–1
20 Aug
D
H Cambuur
0–0 HT 0–0
13 Aug
D
A Waalwijk
2–2 HT 0–2
06 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are PEC Zwolle and Utrecht in coming into this match?

PEC Zwolle have gone 25W 4D 9L in their last 38 games (2.08 PPG), while Utrecht have gone 16W 9D 13L in their last 38 (1.50 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — PEC Zwolle at home or Utrecht away?

PEC Zwolle's home record (2.32 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — PEC Zwolle at home: 2.32 PPG; Utrecht away: 1.47 PPG.

Have PEC Zwolle or Utrecht been keeping clean sheets recently?

PEC Zwolle have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their recent games, Utrecht in 34%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 8 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2021 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 4 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Eredivisie. They last met on 22 February 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Utrecht won 5-1 on 25 Sep 2021, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, PEC Zwolle have gone 1W 2D 1L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Utrecht — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

PEC Zwolle

1

PEC Zwolle

3

Draws

Utrecht

4

Utrecht

Recent Meetings

Utrecht
1–1
22 Feb 26
PEC Zwolle
PEC Zwolle
0–2
31 Aug 25
Utrecht
PEC Zwolle
3–3
01 Feb 25
Utrecht
Utrecht
1–0
11 Aug 24
PEC Zwolle
Utrecht
5–1
03 Apr 24
PEC Zwolle
PEC Zwolle
1–0
27 Aug 23
Utrecht
PEC Zwolle
1–1
07 May 22
Utrecht
Utrecht
5–1
25 Sep 21
PEC Zwolle

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between PEC Zwolle and Utrecht?

From 8 meetings on record, PEC Zwolle have won 1, Utrecht have won 4, and 3 have been drawn.

When did PEC Zwolle and Utrecht last play each other?

They last met on 22 February 2026, when Utrecht 1-1 PEC Zwolle.

Who has won more matches between PEC Zwolle and Utrecht?

Utrecht have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

PEC Zwolle are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 79% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 53% of the time.

Utrecht are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 79% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 10% of those situations.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — PEC Zwolle 58%, Utrecht 58% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 63% for PEC Zwolle and 74% for Utrecht. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 53% and 53% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: PEC Zwolle keep a clean sheet in 37% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = PEC Zwolle home games / Utrecht away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

PEC Zwolle PEC Zwolle Early Season
Metric All
(38 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/38
(81.6%)
15/19
(78.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/38
(60.5%)
9/19
(47.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/7
(85.7%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/7
(71.4%)
4/4
(100%)
Winning at HT 18/38
(47.4%)
10/19
(52.6%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/38
(2.6%)
0/19
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/38
(2.6%)
0/19
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 22/38
(57.9%)
11/19
(57.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 26/38
(68.4%)
12/19
(63.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/38
(52.6%)
10/19
(52.6%)
Clean Sheet 14/38
(36.8%)
7/19
(36.8%)
Failed to Score 3/38
(7.9%)
1/19
(5.3%)
Utrecht Utrecht Early Season
Metric All
(38 games)
Venue
(19 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 25/38
(65.8%)
15/19
(78.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 13/38
(34.2%)
8/19
(42.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/13
(76.9%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/13
(46.2%)
3/4
(75%)
Winning at HT 8/38
(21.1%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/38
(7.9%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/38
(7.9%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 20/38
(52.6%)
11/19
(57.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 22/38
(57.9%)
14/19
(73.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 13/38
(34.2%)
10/19
(52.6%)
Clean Sheet 13/38
(34.2%)
5/19
(26.3%)
Failed to Score 8/38
(21.1%)
3/19
(15.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when PEC Zwolle play Utrecht?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 58% of PEC Zwolle's games and 58% of Utrecht's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is PEC Zwolle vs Utrecht usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 63% of PEC Zwolle's matches and 74% of Utrecht's.

Do PEC Zwolle and Utrecht tend to score early?

PEC Zwolle have had a goal before half-time in 79% of their recent matches, Utrecht in 79% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as PEC Zwolle defy the odds to beat Utrecht 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

PEC Zwolle beat Utrecht 1-0 at MAC³PARK Stadion, Regular Season - 3, in the Eredivisie. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting PEC Zwolle 1.47 xG and Utrecht 1.62 xG, a combined 3.09. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Utrecht landed 1.6 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of PEC Zwolle attack 0.82 / defence 1.16 against Utrecht attack 0.95 / defence 0.98, drawn from 2/36 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it PEC Zwolle 33% | Draw 28% | Utrecht 39%, with Utrecht to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual PEC Zwolle win had been the model's second-ranked read at 33%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 60%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 84% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 64% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 63% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (PEC Zwolle 68%, Utrecht 58%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

PEC Zwolle's trading profile (38 games, 19 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

Utrecht's trading profile (38 games, 19 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, PEC Zwolle arrived the stronger side — 2.08 PPG against 1.50. The form guide was vindicated by the result. PEC Zwolle (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 3.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line. Utrecht (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.89 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.95 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 60% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 64% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 63% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.