🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates PEC Zwolle at 45% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this PEC Zwolle vs Fortuna Sittard encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

MAC³PARK Stadion plays host to PEC Zwolle versus Fortuna Sittard in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 16. Kick-off: Saturday 13 December 2025 at 20:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

PEC Zwolle have collected 1.00 PPG across 10 Eredivisie outings this season: 2W 4D 4L. Last five: L W D W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 2.90 conceded. However, 2.90 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for PEC Zwolle, so this record blends games from this season and last.

PEC Zwolle at MAC³PARK Stadion this season: 4W 3D 3L from 10 home games — 1.50 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 1.50 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.00 — PEC Zwolle are significantly better at MAC³PARK Stadion than their overall form suggests.

Fortuna Sittard's overall Eredivisie record this term: 3W 2D 5L from 10 games (1.10 PPG). Last five: L W D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Fortuna Sittard, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Fortuna Sittard have gone 1W 3D 6L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 0.60 is notably below their overall 1.10 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Neither side holds a meaningful form edge. The 1.00 vs 1.10 PPG split is negligible — model and market signals should carry more analytical weight for this one.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 6 meetings: PEC Zwolle 4W, Fortuna Sittard 2W, 0D.

Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 2.8 goals per game across 6 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 26 Jan 2025, ended 4–1 with PEC Zwolle winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 2.8 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Data

PEC Zwolle goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (49 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 58% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 42% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 39%.

Fortuna Sittard goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (49 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 85% of the time; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — PEC Zwolle 57% versus Fortuna Sittard 51%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (PEC Zwolle 51% | Fortuna Sittard 51%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects PEC Zwolle 1.59 xG and Fortuna Sittard 1.26 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: PEC Zwolle attack 0.795 / defence 0.971 | Fortuna Sittard attack 0.905 / defence 1.156. League average goals — home 1.727 / away 1.432. PEC Zwolle's attack strength of 0.795 is below the league average — the 1.59 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 49 PEC Zwolle games / 49 Fortuna Sittard games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: PEC Zwolle 45% | Draw 25% | Fortuna Sittard 30%. Fair-value odds: PEC Zwolle 2.22 | Draw 4.00 | Fortuna Sittard 3.33. PEC Zwolle hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (25%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 57% | Total xG 2.84. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.84 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 57% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Picks & Verdict

On the Poisson output, PEC Zwolle are the pick at 45% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on PEC Zwolle if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.84 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 54% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.8 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 57% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: PEC Zwolle 40% | Fortuna Sittard 80% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights