🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates NEC Nijmegen at 56%, yet other data sources diverge — this NEC Nijmegen vs Sparta Rotterdam fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

NEC Nijmegen host Sparta Rotterdam at Goffertstadion in Eredivisie, Regular Season - 14. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 29 November 2025 at 20:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Eredivisie games this season, NEC Nijmegen have gone 3W 3D 4L from 10 outings — a 1.20 PPG return. Last five: D D L W W. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for NEC Nijmegen, so this record blends games from this season and last.

NEC Nijmegen's home record at Goffertstadion: 6W 3D 1L from 10 Eredivisie appearances (2.10 PPG). They are averaging 2.70 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.10 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.20 — NEC Nijmegen are significantly better at Goffertstadion than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Sparta Rotterdam stand at 3W 2D 5L from 10 Eredivisie matches — 1.10 PPG. Last five: W W L L D. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets. This season is still relatively young for Sparta Rotterdam, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Eredivisie this season, Sparta Rotterdam have posted 5W 2D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel. Their away PPG of 1.70 exceeds their overall 1.10 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.20 PPG (NEC Nijmegen) versus 1.10 (Sparta Rotterdam). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 8 previous meetings, NEC Nijmegen have won 1, Sparta Rotterdam 2, with 5 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The last 8 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.8 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 6 Apr 2025, ended 0–2 with Sparta Rotterdam winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.8 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Data

NEC Nijmegen trading profile (47 games, 22 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 77% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

Sparta Rotterdam trading profile (47 games, 22 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 64% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — NEC Nijmegen 53% versus Sparta Rotterdam 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NEC Nijmegen 64% | Sparta Rotterdam 45%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects NEC Nijmegen 2.04 xG and Sparta Rotterdam 1.25 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NEC Nijmegen attack 1.363 / defence 0.996 | Sparta Rotterdam attack 0.865 / defence 0.871. League average goals — home 1.722 / away 1.456. NEC Nijmegen carry an above-average attack strength of 1.363 — their λ of 2.04 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Data: 47 NEC Nijmegen games / 47 Sparta Rotterdam games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: NEC Nijmegen 56% | Draw 21% | Sparta Rotterdam 23%. Fair-value odds: NEC Nijmegen 1.79 | Draw 4.76 | Sparta Rotterdam 4.35. The model has a clear lean to NEC Nijmegen (56%) — a 33pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 64% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.30. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 64% — the 3.30 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (2.04 / 1.25) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is NEC Nijmegen at 56% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 21% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.30 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 64% — marginal — conflicting signals confidence, supported by form averaging 3.4 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 62% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: NEC Nijmegen 60% | Sparta Rotterdam 30%.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights